Ruby Video - HERE! and 2 STUNNING pics :D
- Thread starter dr3amz
- Start date
dr3amz said:
Mine is still downloading, I just found the pic on another site.
try getting one of the codec packs from this site:- http://www.free-codecs.com/
the K-lite Codec pack is supposed to have most codecs u'll ever need.
[edit] As WunderChu wrote, make sure u have the latest Quicktime version [/edit]
Johnny_Physics
Newcomer
carpediem said:
Awesome! Thanks a lot!
Well while I'm getting burnt by people for my comments I think I should point out that 3dc surpisingly doesn't only effect the quality of the normal maps ( 3dc is normal map compression ).
You can clearly see the facial hair isn't more blurry on left side then the right ( eye brows show it better then the lip ).
So either one of two this.
1) ATI are deliberatly using lower quality textures for non 3dc cards Other then normal maps OR
2) ATI have photoshopped the image after taking the screen shots.
You can clearly see the facial hair isn't more blurry on left side then the right ( eye brows show it better then the lip ).
So either one of two this.
1) ATI are deliberatly using lower quality textures for non 3dc cards Other then normal maps OR
2) ATI have photoshopped the image after taking the screen shots.
bloodbob said:Well while I'm getting burnt by people for my comments I think I should point out that 3dc surpisingly doesn't only effect the quality of the normal maps ( 3dc is normal map compression ).
You can clearly see the facial hair isn't more blurry on left side then the right ( eye brows show it better then the lip ).
So either one of two this.
1) ATI are deliberatly using lower quality textures for non 3dc cards Other then normal maps OR
2) ATI have photoshopped the image after taking the screen shots.
or!
3. wait for facts before making assumptions - you're assuming that one of your two points here is correct with no foundation.
not jumping on you, just a pointless statement - if you want to argue the point wait for facts etc to show what you believe to be true.
ATI aren't known for modifying images to make certain tech look better, thats nvidias territory
all i can say is watch the tech demo, the quality doesnt really give you anything to compare obviously as its a video - but i really dont think ati need to pull any cheap stunts once theyve shown the Ruby demo to all.
one of the selling points on the card leaked recently was:
BREAKTHROUGH IMAGE QUALITY
The RADEON™ X800 PRO defines a totally new High-Definition Gaming experience for the avid gamer by maximizing performance and image quality in higher detail and at higher resolutions than ever before. ATI‘s new and revolutionary 3Dc™ image enhancement technology brings characters to life and scenery to greater realism by enabling significant improvements to the image detail of character art with increased performance and lower memory usage. 3Dc™ is slated to become the industry standard to support more complex high-definition visual effects in real time.
thop said:PS. Wouldn't it be funny if FarCry looks better with 3Dc implemented than PS3.0?
PPS. bloodbob, you might be on to sth. (with the photoshopped blurring in the enlarged pics) but for me it's too difficult to tell from those rather small screenshots.
someone cut the smaller image and blow it up to the same size - see if it matches?
Similar threads
- Locked
