I predict a 9.2 from gamespot.
I wonder what score Edge magazine will gve to Resistance.
I wonder what score Edge magazine will gve to Resistance.
Resistance: Fall of Man update! BIG READ , come inside!
- Thread starter hey69
- Start date
GamePro reviews Resistance.
http://www.gamepro.com/sony/ps3/games/reviews/86429.shtml
Interesting enough they made a slight comparison to Gears of War and they said Resistance story is much more interesting.
They gave Resistance a 9/10.
http://www.gamepro.com/sony/ps3/games/reviews/86429.shtml
Interesting enough they made a slight comparison to Gears of War and they said Resistance story is much more interesting.
They gave Resistance a 9/10.
while all you guyz are waiting for the gamespot's review even though i think the IGN + the gameinformer is enough, however i present you the best Resistance game play video i ever see.
Link:http://ruliwebfile.dreamwiz.com/mpeg3/sce/ruliweb_ps3_hd_rt_pl.wmv
thanks to solidsnakejej from e-empire forums.
now watch it and you'll understand why this game got so many rave reviews (deservedly).
Link:http://ruliwebfile.dreamwiz.com/mpeg3/sce/ruliweb_ps3_hd_rt_pl.wmv
thanks to solidsnakejej from e-empire forums.
now watch it and you'll understand why this game got so many rave reviews (deservedly).
3.25 for graphics?
I have to agree. Remind me more of HL2 than "next gen." For the record, HL2 graphics are still great, just not as good as it could be. He's also coming fresh off Gears (from the sounds of it) so that could also have influenced it more. A reviewer is just a person, at the end of the day
I have to agree. Remind me more of HL2 than "next gen." For the record, HL2 graphics are still great, just not as good as it could be. He's also coming fresh off Gears (from the sounds of it) so that could also have influenced it more. A reviewer is just a person, at the end of the day
They gave an Xbox port Gun a 4.5 for graphics
So are Wii games going to get .25 for graphics. I don't care what game he just played a 65% for graphics is idiotic.Yes, we know. And a 3.25 is 6.5/10. I don't think the graphics are that bad.
http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/...=6161706&part=rss&tag=gs_reviews&subj=6161706
Gamespot review.Just a good game ,nothing special according to gamespot.
Gamespot review.Just a good game ,nothing special according to gamespot.
Did you read the review or just glance at the score? 8.6 = a great game on their scale.
You would think a game that, according to Gamespot, marries the best of the best first person shooters in recent times would be more than good
Maybe even the 'great' they label it as! Otherwise there'd probably be something wrong with the genre altogether..GameDaily have also posted their review:
http://ps3.gamedaily.com/game/review/?gameid=5258&page=2
4.5 stars / 5
I read the review and if i compare what they gave to resistance to other fps ,it's obvious that they consider it a good game and nothing more.Both F.E.A.R and COD3 outscored it on gamespot very recently.
Thats why I read the reviews as well, scores I find dont reflect what they write about a game in some cases. I remember when IGN gave Deus Ex like a 6.5, it was still an awesome port of a great game that didnt deserve a low score, and the actual review pretty much said the same thing. An out cry on the boards forced them to add a follow up review to shut people up.
That'd probably lose the sale of this game to me if I were in any position to buy it. I either want in depth solo RPGs or co-op action games, which are unfortunately few and far between other than two players playing a mostly single player game.
CoD3 definately looks like a better game in everything(at least the 360 version does).F.E.A.R at least brought something unique to the fps genre with the A.I routines and the extremely good slow motion gunplay.PDZ,i won't even go there,i'll just say that the only problem i had were the semi cartoony graphics.PDZ > COD3 > F.E.A.R > Resistance? I wouldn't mind some of Gamespots drugs
What does resistance have to distinguish from other fps??The 40 player multiplayer??The graphics are good but not amasing(according to IGN,Gamespot,1up which are the 3 biggest videogames' sites),the enemy A.I is nothing special,the setting is generic(WWII-like backgrounds with ...aliens,like a RTCW clone just more open ended).
Why should it score more than COD3 for example other than it is the flagship launch game for the ps3??
Well I own and have played PDZ and the SP game was very weak in my opinion. CO-OP though was fun as well as the MP. The graphics are not that good as well as the art design. I personally would not have given it a 9. Maybe an 8.0.
Are we looking at the same reviews here, because all the reviews that I've read say that its is a great game. The lowest so far is an 8.5 which is either great or outstanding depending on the site. It definetly doesn't mean "nothing special".
Call of Duty looks like a better game in everything?.... but not according to the scores of 2 out of the " 3 biggest video game sites" as you pointed out
A 9 in graphics is bad? I must have missed something.
The only problem you had with PDZ is the cartoony graphics
. Your probably the only person I have ever spoken to who agrees that game should have got 9+ at any site. It easily had the most inflated game scores.F.E.A.R was good. I own it but Resistance is said to have good single player as well. It would take almost nothing to have better multiplayer than F.E.A.R
So according to you it has graphics good but not amazing, unimpressive A.I. and a generic setting.
According to....
Gamespot said:
Last edited by a moderator:
