demalion said:
...., but I really have no desire to blame anyone but the Inquirer for their dedication to portraying themselves as knowledgeable. Extremely often, they do it by parroting what other people have discussed, and completely omitting any recognition that the source is a public forum. Therefore
I, on the other hand, am happy that there is a widely read e-publication that actually do wade through tons of forum dross in search of stuff of publishable nature. And, incidentally, has the balls to publish it too, even when bound to step on the sore toes of the high and mighty.
Here's a toast to Mike Magee, foremost of e-hacks!
Entropy