i think it does work, but only on HDCP compliant PC monitors.What connector is used to make use of those resolutions on a monitor? I thought HDMI was needed for highres output from PS3. Will an HDMI -> DVI connector work for Linux on a PC monitor? And will that not work for GameOS on the same monitor?
and you still dont want a ps3 arwin
Mac Pro with Xeon a 3 GHz - ps3
Benchmark Score Rate Result
Emulate 6502
single-threaded scalar 245.4 - 105.2
Emulate 6502
multi-threaded scalar 974.6 - 57.3
Blowfish
single-threaded scalar 231.2 - 118.7
Blowfish
multi-threaded scalar 920.4 - 165.6
bzip2 Compress
single-threaded scalar 314.1 - 89.8
bzip2 Compress
multi-threaded scalar 1194.4 - 124.1
bzip2 Decompress
single-threaded scalar 289.8 76.6
bzip2 Decompress
multi-threaded scalar 1353.3 - 99.5
Floating Point Performance
Benchmark Score Rate Result
Mandelbrot
single-threaded scalar 202.5 - 49.0
Mandelbrot
multi-threaded scalar 807.5 - 72.1
Dot Product
single-threaded scalar 362.9 120.0
Dot Product
multi-threaded scalar 1134.5 119
Dot Product
single-threaded vector 173.5 70
Dot Product
multi-threaded vector 516.7 119
JPEG Compress
single-threaded scalar 218.9 70
JPEG Compress
multi-threaded scalar 877.6 94.8
JPEG Decompress
single-threaded scalar 230.5 61.6
JPEG Decompress
multi-threaded scalar 788.9 72.9
Memory Performance
Benchmark Score Rate Result
Read Sequential
single-threaded scalar 368.7 51.9
Read Sequential
multi-threaded scalar 183.0 56.9
Write Sequential
single-threaded scalar 573.6 194
Write Sequential
multi-threaded scalar 281.3 191
Stdlib Allocate
single-threaded scalar 405.8 43.4
Stdlib Allocate
multi-threaded scalar 52.1 51
Stdlib Write
single-threaded scalar 121.5 331
Stdlib Write
multi-threaded scalar 204.4 365
Stdlib Copy
single-threaded scalar 243.3 64.5
Stdlib Copy
multi-threaded scalar 441.1 102
Stream Performance
Benchmark Score Rate Result
Stream Copy
single-threaded scalar 213.0 89.7
Stream Copy
multi-threaded scalar 359.7 109.9
Stream Copy
single-threaded vector 209.5 101.4
Stream Copy
multi-threaded vector 336.9 62.6
Stream Scale
single-threaded scalar 226.2 93.2
http://www.geekpatrol.ca/browse/2006/?view&id=10783
this is how it perform against a monocore Xeon at 3 GHz
The listed CPU is Xeon 5160, which I think only goes up to Dual core, no? But going by some of the results, these are user-supplied figures without any validation of the setup, so it could be a quad-core setup reported incorrectly. It certainly seems unlikely that a mono core or dual core could get a 4x increase in performance from going multithreaded.Those scores don't look single core to me -- seems like a Quad core based on the "multi-threaded" results. And that's just a mean comparison.
The listed CPU is Xeon 5160, which I think only goes up to Dual core, no? But going by some of the results, these are user-supplied figures without any validation of the setup, so it could be a quad-core setup reported incorrectly. It certainly seems unlikely that a mono core or dual core could get a 4x increase in performance from going multithreaded.
Physical Processor Count 4
So...why did you post it? After having the PPE compared to an equivalent single-core processor, you thought you'd compare it to a 4 core architecture, using four cores of the Xeon, but only one of Cell's 7 available...? I don't see the sense in that. Why's it important to know that a 4 Core 3 GHz Xeon is that much faster then PPE?
this is how it perform against a monocore Xeon at 3 GHz
As stupid as that was, at least we can see the single threaded scores. A single core of a 3GHz woodcrest is about 3x the speed of the PPE (except the erratic memory tests which are sort of meaningless for real world perf). That's not bad considering these aren't hand-tuned binaries, but it does show how much was sacrificed in making the PPE so small.So...why did you post it? After having the PPE compared to an equivalent single-core processor, you thought you'd compare it to a 4 core architecture, using four cores of the Xeon, but only one of Cell's 7 available...? I don't see the sense in that. Why's it important to know that a 4 Core 3 GHz Xeon is that much faster then PPE?
That was a rather convoluted way of making a statement :smile:I doubt many anti-SPE proponents really want to see those.