I don't know about the technical details between both, but looks close to me if not better.
http://www.thefatwebsite.com/wp-content/uploads/uncharted23.png
http://www.play-mag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/1-173.jpg
[PS3] Killzone 3
- Thread starter patsu
- Start date
- Status
I don't know about the technical details between both, but looks close to me if not better.
http://www.thefatwebsite.com/wp-content/uploads/uncharted23.png
http://www.play-mag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/1-173.jpg
Either looks ace. I'd go with Unchartereds eyes mind. What will Unchartered 3 look like? Given another 9 months or so of dev time.............
By the looks of it i'd absolutely say no.
The quality of lighting, assets and effects used in kz3's cutscenes are virtually identical to the gameplay, at least to me. The animation though are better mo capped in the cutscenes.
Just remember that especially on a forum like B3D making hyperbole statements will make others do a reseach and analyse technical merits and visual merits. Nobody can claim to be the strongest man by words alone and no evidence. Sadly it generally is PS3 threads that are full of hyperbole and users endlessly claiming anything to be the best or superior or whatever. Heck just look at B3D history and all of the threads and bans generated by lunatics, it's like they worship the piece of electronic.
Anwyay this goes wildly OT but this B3D, analyzing FTW.
I don't mind the judging the graphics because it is a tech forum but some of you guys are as fair and balanced as fox news. When see some of you guys names in a ps3 exclusive thread it never good but in a 360 thread or multiplat I don't see the same judgment.
If someone thinks it the best graphics ever for them is ok...its their opinion. It would be nice if their was a standardized way the judge graphic but their isn't.
This is shaping up to be a great game:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=24976387&postcount=241
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=24976387&postcount=241
It looks like GG have perfected it with this iteration of KZ. It's only taken three iterations!! This is so on pre-order.
The comparisons between CS2 and KZ3 are disingenuous at best. Until there is a version, of CS2, running on the PS3 with direct feed shots we don't have anything other than opinions to compare. IMO the original Crysis and the KZ1 have quite a bit in common. They both excelled technically, they both pushed the hardware platform they were created on to the max, and both were fundamentally flawed games almost to the point of being broken in places.
The difference being that GG has perfected the game play. Crytek have yet to prove themselves in this respect. What's the point in have an all singing all dancing engine if the game is mediocre at best?
The comparisons between CS2 and KZ3 are disingenuous at best. Until there is a version, of CS2, running on the PS3 with direct feed shots we don't have anything other than opinions to compare. IMO the original Crysis and the KZ1 have quite a bit in common. They both excelled technically, they both pushed the hardware platform they were created on to the max, and both were fundamentally flawed games almost to the point of being broken in places.
The difference being that GG has perfected the game play. Crytek have yet to prove themselves in this respect. What's the point in have an all singing all dancing engine if the game is mediocre at best?
Er, texture work is pretty mixed - they're using a low res base texture and overlay tiling detail textures on top of it for cloth weave and such. It's very evident once you start to look at the larger details...
Some of the lighting is quite inconsistent too, that group shot with lots of characters looks like a bad photoshop, like literally pasting various cutout figures on top of an unrelated photograph.
I also don't like how bright areas of the image clip to white all too often... But everything with that huge walker looks utterly amazing. So it's mostly a question of art direction, although that might be limited by the underlying tech.
Some of the lighting is quite inconsistent too, that group shot with lots of characters looks like a bad photoshop, like literally pasting various cutout figures on top of an unrelated photograph.
I also don't like how bright areas of the image clip to white all too often... But everything with that huge walker looks utterly amazing. So it's mostly a question of art direction, although that might be limited by the underlying tech.
Guess so...notice the area under red box (left of the image)
http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/6084/1220c.jpg
Last edited by a moderator:
L. Scofield
Veteran
I wasn't aware there was such an option in KZ3 since all the co-op footage I've seen is with the screen split vertically. Any source on that?
All games have tradeoffs, C2 does, KZ2/3 does, Halo games do, etc...
Doesn't seem like it. The latest videos don't have it.
http://www.play-mag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/1-169.jpg
those shadows around the legs definitely looks like SSAO, contact shadow or normal shadow dont look like that. Maybe they are using some kind of object base AO.
those shadows around the legs definitely looks like SSAO, contact shadow or normal shadow dont look like that. Maybe they are using some kind of object base AO.
Headshot81
Newcomer
When i started playing KZ3 betta with bots, and noticed that when you shoot multiple rounds at the ground, you get shots that ricochet, i noticed this when i was using the mech and is started seeing some shots hitting the walls!, same as when shooting on foot.
Another thing i noticed is that when you're outside on Corinth Highway, the particle/flame debris glow and illuminates the wall you're near. Just subtle things, but pretty good if you ask me.
Another thing i noticed is that when you're outside on Corinth Highway, the particle/flame debris glow and illuminates the wall you're near. Just subtle things, but pretty good if you ask me.
Interesting. Does it only ricochet if it hits the surface at a glancing angle, like in Reach? It would seem a bit odd if it hit the wall directly, only to ricochet off and kill you
I wonder this too. Online co-op is much more important than MLAA, SSAO or any other technical details for average joe, the majority. They had 2 years to implement new gameplay modes to the KZ2 engine but it seems they didn't bother. Looks like it was more intriguing to mess existing menus, weapon balance or classes [ except Assault ].
They already proved that they're one the best studios besides Naughty Dog and Santa Monica, with KZ2. They should have focused on gameplay & game modes this time. Too much bad decisions [ no Dedicated servers, server lists etc ] from GG this time. Yoshida must remind them they're game developers not Team ICE.
- Status
Similar threads
- Deleted member 2197
- Games
