Lucid_Dreamer
Veteran
Yet, we've seen WAY more of KZ3 than Crysis 2 on consoles. KZ3 is fine to talk about, but not the things you are saying about Crysis 2.So, I assume KZ3 should be kept away from comparisons to other games as well, since it hasn't been released either?
I'm following your ambigous statements. I guess you can fire them off, but can't take them directed right back at you. Particle effects can completely bathe the screen in KZ2 and more so in KZ3. Every plasma shot may be a light source in C2, but it's still not even ballpark to the dynamic light sources on screen at once in KZ2. I'll give you the HDR lighting. On one of the Crysis 2 GIFs, the running alien has no shadow.More ambiguous statements. What makes the particles and guns in KZ3 "a generation above Crysis 2's"? How many characters does it show on screen, Crysis 2 shows many as well (like in the E3 videos), light sources, well, every plasma shot is a light source in Crysis 2 (and I'm not talking about the muzzleflashes, add that as well), and like I said, 100% realtime lighting and shadowing with GI and HDR (now that's a gen ahead xD). As to weather effects, yeah, that's yet to be seen.
No. What reeks of fanboyism is someone popping up, when praise of certain games come up, with as much anti-hype as possible. Then, that same person to praise other lesser titles with as much hype as he/she can muster.Even if it didn't match KZ2/3, it's certainly close. Claiming that no game even approaches them reeks of fanboyism. It's like trolling every other game out there.
As a technical package, I haven't seen a console game, outside of Sony's studios; match KZ2 yet.