There's plenty of 360 advantages that aren't mentioned as well.
Sure but the article is about PS3, not Xbox 360. So there is no point in listing all the functionalities in Xbox 360 ?
How about "Measured in megaflops, gigabytes and other technical benchmarks, the PlayStation 3 is certainly the world’s most powerful game console." (NYTimes), "the Playstation3 is powered by a stupendously powerful chip, the "Cell processor." " (TIME), "It's got some good-looking games, but unless you have a top-notch TV, the difference isn't mind-blowing." (TIME) (Implying the games do actually look better than the 360, which so far is not the case), "The PS3, which was introduced in North America on Friday with a hefty $599 price tag for the top version, certainly delivers gorgeous graphics. But they are not discernibly prettier than the Xbox 360’s. " (NYTimes) (Same implication, that the PS3 games don't actually look worse than the 360 at the moment).
"one of Sony’s main selling points has been that the PS3 plays Blu-Ray high-definition movie discs." (NYTimes), "It doubles as a Blu-Ray DVD player (that's the main reason for the high retail price)" (TIME)
You forgot about the "Nobody cares" quote in the article (refering to Blu-ray)
Like I said, when these features are mentioned, it is downplayed. You can refer to my previous post and Titanio's for the lists.
As for whether the games require top-notch TV to be mind-blowing, it depends on what's amazing about them (I don't think they are all about sharp/pretty pictures). Resistance is still a good game with many things happening at the same time (and I assume it will still rain/snow on a low/mid-end TV... assuming those scenes are impressive like what people seem to say). The MotorStorm demo is still going to be hectic and bumpy as hell.
quest55720 said:
Those unique strengths are all non-gaming. This is a gaming console first and foremost I don't see why the media should mention some things only a few hardcore tech geeks will take advantage of. If the writer really wanted to nail sony to the wall he could of with the scaling issue. The writer more than anything is just disapointed the PS3 could not live up to the E3 2005 hype and is expressing that.
What is SIXAXIS ? It's not even mentioned in the article.
How about the additional 40Gb of disk space ? and WiFi ? (since they are using 600 USD as the benchmark). These hardware help to make gaming more convenient. HDD helps to make more games load fasters (like what Genji is doing), my wife would kill me if I pull a cable all the way from second floor to my family room.
Is MotorStorm demo not impressive enough ?
Isn't silent operation and a solid build quality that allows PS3 to run continuously a good thing for gamers ?
Free online gaming ?
...
What "only a few hardcore tech geeks" technologies are you thinking of ? I did not list any Linux capability in my post. I didn't even talk about Blu-ray (Blu-ray Java and Blu-ray LIVE, whatever that is). I looked through the article quickly. I also don't see anything about E3 2005.
Like I said, nailing Sony to the wall with scaling issue is good for the consumers if the lack-of-feature is indeed a major thing.
EDIT:
Ok... Sony replied. Looks like it will be a firmware upgrade to address the issue.
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showpost.php?p=878078&postcount=284