Its really silly for people to make thought experiment arguments and cite that as the reason why Kinect doesn't work well or in some cases at all.
Yes and no. Perhaps this was the wrong topic to engage in a discussion, but i thought it was largely relevant to the topic at hand. The way I see it, voice control is extremely difficult to gauge or put into a rating of % when talking about accuracy.
A user / voter could be voting a 90% hit rate because all he uses the VC for are commands that work. On the other hand, a user voting less than 50% might be concentrating on commands that dont work half of the time. Then again, a 90% vote could also represent accurately a full in depth attempt to test all the commands in both ideal and less ideal circumstances. What it comes down to, is the use-case. As i raised before; if a 9 out of 10 commands work, does that constitute a 90% vote? Or would it be more relevant to say 9 commands had a 100% hit rate while one command had to be repeated 6 times, so the hit rate would effectively be 66%? Both votes would seem unfair / inaccurate, but then there's probably no ideal way to put something like this into a % rating (IMO). It's, afterall, not like remote with 10 buttons that simply work. If one fails, the button is simply 'broken' but the rest will still have a close to 100% hit rate. Not quite that simple to gauge in VC as its such a complex device mechanic.
As a opinion marker from owners, it's great poll. It's as indicative as a poll asking its members 'in %, how happy are you with your console'. People focusing on what they like will naturally vote higher than members that dont.
I dont quite share Shifty's downbeat fashion about the fanboyism in here. Xbox One is in the headline of pretty every topic precicely because it's trying to revolutionize in an area that hasnt been done on this scale before. Will it succeed? Will it not? I'm here mainly to discuss on the possibilities. I might not be an owner, but that doesnt mean i cant have an opinion or raise valid points/concerns.
What we need are topics for Xbox owners where the lucky few that have one can sit down and geek over their toy - and leave other topics where things are analyzed open for critical and constructive discussion. As long as the raised points are raised in a way that they provoke constructive discussion in a respectful manner, i dont see an issue.
The Xbox One is an interesting topic because it's trying to be more than a console. So while the console itself might deserve a rating of 90%, it may not if you view it as a multi media device. Perhaps we need better rules to define where we can talk about which aspects of the device?