Christ if I thought the 60FPS or bust crowd were insufferable the 120FPS or bust crowd are going to put them in the halfpenny place aren't they?
Wait until they realize their TVs only do 60hz.
Tommy McClain
Christ if I thought the 60FPS or bust crowd were insufferable the 120FPS or bust crowd are going to put them in the halfpenny place aren't they?
Yea, but its more like, if you do that, it's not always being loaded to it's maximum capability. It's only for that specific scene/moment/town etc.Like i said, games being designed as gpu limited only occured this gen due to jaguar. It was a neccessity to get games to work in general.
Devs wanting to push their games with much more powerful hardware will still always be want for resources. To say "its unlikely for the cpus to be pushed hard" is strange to me considering that resources always intensify for gaming no matter the generation as games become more complex.
You simply put enough npcs in a crowded area and of course the hardware will be given a workout. I dont see how one argues that stops being the case this gen when its never been the case otherwise
I think in a general case, sure, I would say that monitors are likely higher quality than most TVs. When you can buy a 30"-40" TV at a lower or same price of monitors in the 21" range... there is something to be said for sure.
I think when you enter the high end line of TVs, the quality is definitely in favour of TVs for all things except refresh rate and gaming features.
Like i said, games being designed as gpu limited only occured this gen due to jaguar. It was a neccessity to get games to work in general.
Devs wanting to push their games with much more powerful hardware will still always be want for resources. To say "its unlikely for the cpus to be pushed hard" is strange to me considering that resources always intensify for gaming no matter the generation as games become more complex.
You simply put enough npcs in a crowded area and of course the hardware will be given a workout. I dont see how one argues that stops being the case this gen when its never been the case otherwise
Even the fastest intel cpu is limiting the fastest gpu of today (36tf 3090).
Cpus in consoles cant be fast enough, could they run zen3 4ghz processors that would be even better. Although i understand that the cpus there wont be bottlenecking their gpus anyway.
Sony better have Dolby Vision and Atmos support on those or I will be very disappointed.
Crunchyroll & Hulu were missing from the initial list but have since been confirmed to be coming. Still missing some big ones like CBS All Access, HBO Max, Vudu & a few others...
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/10/ps5-will-be-missing-some-ps4-video-streaming-apps-at-launch/
Is it possible that PS4 apps won't work in compatibility mode, only games?
Tommy McClain
You confuse bad multithreaded title with games not pushing GPU further. With the good CPU in next gen consoles, AAA teams will improve a lot the parrallism of the engine because they have powerful 8 cores 16 threads CPU not the shitty Jaguar. Read the twitter topic, some devs begins to quit the render and graphic thread paradigm like Naughty Dog did for the Jaguar CPU in 2014 and before because they did not have the choice the CELL processor.
Sony better have Dolby Vision and Atmos support on those or I will be very disappointed.
Indeed.
Has Dolby Vision and Atmos been confirmed even for UHD BD playback? Or for games?
I thought there was an open question as to whether they are paying for the licensing costs.
PS4 currently does Atmos for Blu-ray movies but not apps or games.
No word on DV for PS5 but we can all assume that UHD Blu-ray will get Atmos at least. That doesn’t mean we’ll get it (and DV) on apps/games.
I think you misunderstand me. The consoles cant have a too fast processor, ofcourse a faster one is going to open up for even more capabilities.