PSN is weird since PS3 era.Then they must have paid for the lowest tiers of CDN plans because it's been bad for as long as Playstation has been online.
Can you not set the console to keep games up-to-date automatically, so when Person A buys a game it automatically downloads to Console B? That way Person B never has to login as Person A again. Only some games get a little odd with addon DLC needing to be kicked off that way. Thats how it works elsewhere.
Oh I know what you mean now. I’m not sure actually, now that you mention that it probably works?
The disc drive itself makes the disc version look bad even without the price aspect imo
You are basically paying more money for a less aesthetically pleasing console
Is there a stand/leg to stop the disc version from wobbling while laying horizontally?
Seems an odd choice. Even if I had something to stack on top of it, I'm not sure I'd want to do it, so I'd rather just have the drive on top for easier access.The stand is inside the package.
Doesn't have to be higher, they get a bigger cut form each sale.
At $400 you get more than double the console power for just 1/3rd the price extra...I really hope this is true as I'm going to love seeing how the sales translate
The number typically quoted for retailer spilt from a $70 sale is 30%, now traditional retailers have to deal with aged stock etc so that number is often lower in reality. Sony will be banking that 30% with the DE every time but on a full price game that is still only an additional ~$14 per game sold assuming they are buying a full price title and not from a sale event (often costs are split for these with retailer and vendor taking less). If they go with the DE at $399 it is a big bet on people buying a lot of titles in the next 12-8 months
Consumer spend through the PS4 ecosystem estimated at over $20bn for the first time in FY18
• Average lifetime device spend exceeds $700
• Average launch year lifetime device spend exceeds $1,600
Price announcement has been a game of cat and mouse, therefore we will see it at today's PS5 games showcase.
They have 9 Sony titles planned to release this year. On a first party game, Sony takes 100% of the sale. And first year adopter spend on average for the first 5 years of a generation more than 1600 dollars in PS4 ecosystem in games and network services excluding hardware. Most of them have PS plus and will buy multiple games some from Sony or third party. Early adopters are big spender. And Sony will probably release more games this generation, they prepare it since a long time, explaining since 2015 the PS4 exclusives planning was too weak for the first part of the generation. I think first year buyer will spend more on PS5 ecosystem than on PS4.
Yes the $1400 spend from a launch consumer is a fascinating number to see, just as a small quibble the first party publishing advantage is still only 30% as all the rest of the cash was coming their way anyway even if the sale was via walmart or what have you, the delta they want is the retailer share.
Also not surprised MediaMarkt has lost all patience
I think the most interesting launch game is Demon's souls (did you forget that game?). Also playing my PS4 backlog with near instant loadings (~1 sec) is actually very promising.Heart vs logic
My decisions points list
1. I am buying a PS5 due to PS exclusives
2. I want to play NG games now.
..
47. I do not play many 3 party games
48. Mostly smaller titles are played when not playing 1st party games
..
87. My PS4 back catalog
Reality
1. None of the 1st party launch window PS5 games that we know about now, are interesting to me (SPiderman + Rachet + Horizon)
2. I want to play Cyberpunk 2077 and Dirt5
3. I want to play Ghost of Tsushima Legends
Still getting a PS5DE and nope, not planning on getting a XSX, just because I think future PS5 first games will rock