What I"m wondering is, how did you come to your conclusion that the vertical line not appearing red is the result of coverting to YUV with 4:2:2 compression? You stated this as if it was a fact, but haven't provided any evidence to prove as much.
It's quite simple actually. I think i cropped image too much...
Did you see first 4 top rows? They are different from the others:
..._ r _ _ R _ B R G _R...
others are:
..._ _ _ _ R _ B R G _R...
This 2 different patterns repeat every 2 columns, making some nasty "block" effect, making line thinner (7 subpixels) or thicker (10 subpixels).
I assumed this "aliasing" is an interference of 2 "pixel frequencies", 1920 pixel/line and 960 pixel/line (well, the terminology is questionable).
Ok, why R (V in YUV) is shifted? Why not to use the same V value for both pixels? One possible explanation is that the device was designed for MPEG2 playback, where U and V sampling position was 0.25, instead of 0.5 (center) in MPEG4 and H.264.
* "B R G" in image is the Y component (the brightness), which is correctly sampled in full resolution
I'm also curious as to the merit of your suggestion that all G10 and G11 Panasonic plasmas suffer from the fault you illsutated. I gather that you are testing your own display, but have you done or seen testing of all models?
I tested TH-50PZ700E (G10), TH-R42PV70 (G10) and TH-R42PV80 (G11).
Last 2 arent fullhd (1024x768) and cannot run in pixel to pixel mode, but they have the same problem (vertical red lines are GREY), and the same "block" pattern.