D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Yeah, @Kaotik pointed that out above though somehow don't think I feel as dupped as TechPowerUp.Reoorted as fake...if you google a little bit
Yeah, @Kaotik pointed that out above though somehow don't think I feel as dupped as TechPowerUp.Reoorted as fake...if you google a little bit
"3060 Ultra" you mean? That's basically the long rumored 3060 12GB model, likely photoshopped with "Ultra" and "12GB" by some bloke bored by lockdowns.Hoping the 3060 Super is real and a good sign for the "Super" series
"3060 Ultra" you mean? That's basically the long rumored 3060 12GB model, likely photoshopped with "Ultra" and "12GB" by some bloke bored by lockdowns.
What's good in it? It's doubtful that even 3070 will need more than 8GB of VRAM during its lifespan.
I also fail to see what would be so good about 3070 and 3080 with double the VRAM - it would likely kill off their price/perf and that's about it.
Ooops, Ultra, right. Anyway, the "You won't need more than" argument is hilarious, just stop. You already need more on some current titles than 8gb if you're run at 4k. As long as there's fractionally above the 10gb limit the Series X has for fast ram then it should be perfectly acceptable for the mainstream. The argument that somehow devs won't use up all the VRAM they can get for some titles this gen, despite doing it every single previous gen, is flagging on pathetic. Nvidia didn't put enough VRAM in their cards so they could maximize profit margins and sales throughput. Oh look companies aren't your friends! Get over it already.
Yeah, facts are just hilarious when they go against your agenda.Anyway, the "You won't need more than" argument is hilarious, just stop.
Now this one is actually hilarious because of:You already need more on some current titles than 8gb if you're run at 4k.
Perfectly acceptable for what exactly? How many PC gamers are running their games "in 4K" with a mix of medium settings on a mid range GPU while limiting them to 30 fps to boot? If this even something which anyone does?As long as there's fractionally above the 10gb limit the Series X has for fast ram then it should be perfectly acceptable for the mainstream.
What's flagging on pathetic at this point is the argument that you "need" more than 8GB for 4K on a card which can't really do 4K already due to processing limits and without any data to actually back up that "need".The argument that somehow devs won't use up all the VRAM they can get for some titles this gen, despite doing it every single previous gen, is flagging on pathetic.
Again, this is what's actually hilarious and pathetic as you can't provide even one example of 8-10GB not being "enough". So yeah companies are not your friend and you're just doing AMD PR at the moment. Get over it already.Nvidia didn't put enough VRAM in their cards so they could maximize profit margins and sales throughput. Oh look companies aren't your friends! Get over it already.
Msi after burner does the difference since september or october. But you have to dig in the options.
For the same price sure, I'd love a 20GB one too. It wouldn't be the same price though and would likely be the exact same in gaming performance. And if you actually need 16GB or more for work there are products with such VRAM sizes.I'd love a 16Gb card for hobby rendering.
Why would anyone expect it to be the same price? I'd pay $50-100 for a 16gb version of a 3070. And yes if it's for work there are obviously professional cards for they purpose that have higher VRAM and additional support. I can't justify $1500 for Daz 3D.For the same price sure, I'd love a 20GB one too. It wouldn't be the same price though and would likely be the exact same in gaming performance. And if you actually need 16GB or more for work there are products with such VRAM sizes.
Well I dunno, people who are saying that "8GB isn't enough"? What they should be saying instead is that 16GB at $650 is better than 8GB at $500 - which would be factually incorrect in any price/perf metric so they don't say this at all.Why would anyone expect it to be the same price? I'd pay $50-100 for a 16gb version of a 3070. And yes if it's for work there are obviously professional cards for they purpose that have higher VRAM and additional support. I can't justify $1500 for Daz 3D.
That's because it's not textures in case of Doom Eternal, it's the size of the streaming buffer, and the faster storage you have the smaller it can actually be with zero effect on IQ.The one example people use is Doom Eternal with Ultra Nightmare textures at 4K. Unfortunately it has zero IQ difference to regular old Ultra textures.
Why would anyone expect it to be the same price? I'd pay $50-100 for a 16gb version of a 3070. And yes if it's for work there are obviously professional cards for they purpose that have higher VRAM and additional support. I can't justify $1500 for Daz 3D.
I think it's pretty ballsy of NV to plan to release both 6 and 12 GB versions of 3060
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 TUF GAMING with 12GB GDDR6 memory leakedIt is alleged that the RTX 3060 12GB will have a different GPU variant than previously reported. Basically, the GA106-400 SKU has been replaced with GA106-300, which means that both RTX 3060 12GB and ‘rumored’ RTX 3060 6GB would now offer the same specifications. The 6GB version has been delayed, in fact, some sources claim it might even be canceled.