this is yummy.
my dream computer now has :
FX-4300
16GB ddr3
top end GT 640 with 2GB gddr5, GPU overclocking and silent cooling
256GB SSD + NAS storage
350W PSU
Xonar sound card (I own those latter two items)
nothing really high end but that would be a beast for me.
Yeah what the graph is showing is pretty clear. I'm just not sure why they even bothered....
Why use that wording then? Why not say "Units sold globally" and cut out all doubt? Sounds like a load of marketing crap to me.
The vertical axis is labeled as "Units Sold Out Globally" but there are no numbers attached to it, making things incredibly vague.
When I asked for clarification all I was really given was that "it means sales of boards from AICs to distributors, system builders, e-tailers and retailers." This indicates that we are talking about boards either on Newegg.com, at Fry's or being sold through system builders like Maingear and Puget Systems.
The term "sold out" gave me a bit of pause - but when questioned "is it fair to translate 'units sold out globally' to 'units sold globally'?" I received an affirmative.
What they are doing is simply trying to justify the close to nonexistent availability.
this is yummy.
my dream computer now has :
FX-4300
16GB ddr3
top end GT 640 with 2GB gddr5, GPU overclocking and silent cooling
256GB SSD + NAS storage
350W PSU
Xonar sound card (I own those latter two items)
nothing really high end but that would be a beast for me.
What they are doing is simply trying to justify the close to nonexistent availability. Their marketing machine is simply working but it would be much better if they direct these efforts in something worth it.
People don't graze grass.
When I went to the local pc store to buy my HD 7970, they had several (populated, I asked) boxes of GTX 680 standing there. It was a mid-sized store (KM electronics) in a mid-sized town in northern bavaria. There really is no issue with availability here in germany. (Dunno how often I wrote that).
What they are doing is simply trying to justify the close to nonexistent availability. Their marketing machine is simply working but it would be much better if they direct these efforts in something worth it.
People don't graze grass.
Honestly you'd be better off buying an Athlon II X2 or X4 than the FX-4300. That CPU is abysmal.
A Core i3 would also work.
At this point, I think there's little reason to doubt that Nvidia is selling all the cards they can make, and that number is higher than they would have expected given their last card priced in this range. I'm sure they're taking all the production capacity TSMC is providing at this price point. What would you suggest they do differently - raise prices?
What would you suggest they do differently - raise prices?
I have no idea why you had several boxes out there, maybe this moment in time coincides with the period of time when there was some availability there http://www1.hardwareversand.de/articlesearch.jsp, I put the link few posts earlier but no one cares to comment.
So, this means- currently there is availability in USA via newegg but nonexistent in Germany in one of their biggest online stores. Exactly the opposite to what the situation was few weeks ago.
I suspect this is part of their strategy to try to camouflage the low availability, plus the marketing efforts to support this line of thoughts.
More engineers does not fix capacity issues. What makes you think yields are an issue? And wouldn't this shift in engineering allocation result in delays in front-end design and thus delayed market introduction? (Naively assuming that a front-end designer can be swapped at will into a process related function.) And given that all fabless companies have very close cooperation with their fabs, why do you think Nvidia doesn't? They've been shouting from the roof that they do.UniversalTruth said:1. Relocate more hardware engineers resources where appropriate in order to have better collaboration with the foundry which should inevitably result in drastically improved yields- AMD doesn't have such (so emphasized) issues with HD 7900 series.
You think they aren't doing that already?2. Talk with TSMC to instantly improve manufacturing capacity- if demand is that high and they can't improve yields.
Most people want a 680 probably already have a 6970 or 580. Or they decided to skip a generation and wait for this one. Also, it would drag down ASPs of the lower performance 28nm products. A short sighted tactic with low reaching negative results.3. Reduce previous generations prices- this will have the effect to offload the pressure and people's need to buy exactly 680. Given its weak computation capabilities too.
Are they currently lying?4. Or in case of lying- stop lying that you don't have sufficient supply- simply stop that artificial high price keeping.
AMD doesn't have such (so emphasized) issues with HD 7900 series.
GK107 GT 640 seems to be launched at Computex:
More engineers does not fix capacity issues. What makes you think yields are an issue?
I do see anything particularly sinister going on: supply is decent, but demand is obviously exceptional.
Charlie says so, and there is no reason not to believe him.