Now Razor's post would be funny.
If there wouldn't be any errors in that data yes.
NVIDIA GF100 & Friends speculation
- Thread starter Arty
- Start date
If there wouldn't be any errors in that data yes.
onethreehill
Newcomer
jimmyjames123
Regular
Surely they are wrong about core clock frequency, correct? I mean, sure, it is theoretically possible that core clock frequency = half hot clock frequency, but it's odd that NVIDIA would do this given that they intentionally designed the chip to have certain functional units operating at half hot clock freq (and, by intention, higher than core clock freq).
Those core clock frequency are correct.GF100's core clock is just GPC clock,not ROP/L2 clock.
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=22654
Point taken since the percentage is roughly the same.
Its hard to believe that such a minor precision difference would have any impact in actual game. Something like a difference of 1/1000000 will make zero impact in game.
The biggest problem right now is the amount of calculation and not preccision. Objects jerk around in games because they have such a limited physics model in game. Even if u would end always with 1/1000 error (which would be quite shame in year 2010) It would be imposible to see the diference.
I think people here are too much focused on the actual numbers and precision. The difference betwen force of 1001 and 1000 would be imposible to see.
You might think so, but the differences tend to add up rather rapidly. Consider, for instance, if you have 60 physics updates per second, it only takes about 11.5 seconds for a 1/1000 error to be as large as the number in question.
For example, if your system adds energy due to numerical errors at a rate of 1/1000 every physics update, at 60 updates/sec, the energy gets doubled after only 11.5 seconds just due to errors.
The engraved surface of the cooler enclosure seems to be metal. Looks like this part is used to dissipate additional heat out of the unit?!
FrameBuffer
Banned
Will that mean XMAN/Razor1 will be eating shorts ?
(as they both seemed rather adamant that 480 rumor was FUD and the "real GTX 480" was 512 Cuda Cores) .. I vote for cherry flavored edibles lolWill that mean XMAN/Razor1 will be eating shorts ?
Not only that, but that site from Galaxy says it is 512
In case of Fudo, who's almost part of nV PR, in general the more negative it's towards nV it is, the more likely it's to be true
Not only that, but that site from Galaxy says it is 512
Because it is NOT 480 for the GTX480.
chavvdarrr
Veteran
Similar threads
- Deleted member 2197
- Architecture and Products
