Only in a few games, not generally. And I bet that ATI will be late with optimizing Metro33. ^^
NVIDIA GF100 & Friends speculation
- Thread starter Arty
- Start date
That's an interesting bet you have there.
...based on what, exactly?
Couldn't have said it better actually.
But where is the benchmark demo? Shouldn't it be floating around by now?
Last edited by a moderator:
They (ATI) have a different mantra now, I bet they will have tweaks for Metro33 sooner than you'd bet however how much of a gain they squeeze and will it be matter are two questions which are more appropriate.
DegustatoR
Legend
So should we assume that every DX11 title released up to date will be faster on AMD?
what kind of silly arguement is this ?
Nvidia exchanged money with this developer. Believe out right payments for performance , believe marketing money . Whatever you believe you can bet that nvidia didn't pay out money for a game to be slower on its hardware.
That's a good default assumption. Anyone can buy a boatload of ATI DX11 cards to play with and tune for.
NV DX11 cards are in short supply. I'm sure key developers have a few, but there's a big difference between having 1-3 cards running around your office and having 10s or 100s to play with.
Given that ATI cards have been around for a lot longer, devs are just going to be a lot more familiar with them and have more motivation for tuning (what is ATI's DX11 marketshare again?).
DK
100%
Why was DoWII faster on ATi hardware? Check wasn't big enough?
http://www.techspot.com/review/221-ati-radeon-hd-5970/page9.html
Because ATI has brand new hardware ? Seems to me that Dawn of war 2 is faster on last gen nvidia cards than ati last gen video cards.
The 4870x2 is slower than the single gpu gtx 285.
Pretty sure that was rhetorical
I know
Sometimes on the internet you need the answer to rhetorical questions as some pretend not to know them I'm not talking about Evergreen.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GeForce_GTX_285_MARS/10.html
Last edited by a moderator:
A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
Veteran
You belief is completely not based in reality. nVidia does not pay out any money and when you makes quotes like that you expose yourself as an uninformed spreader of FUD.
Why don't you actually read what nVidia does and doesn't do for game developers.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multim...e_Developers_for_Implementation_of_PhysX.html
Not really, all in all it is doing more. Just becouse draw distance for procedural clutter is reduced doesn't change that it has increased load due to upped draw distances for other stuff. Also increased load due to more intensive post process/effect use and increased AI entities in battle upto 40 entities at the same time active. And warhead has more higher res textures and comes with a higher memory footprint than Crysis due to the increased detail.
Apparently it really depends on who you ask. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2009/10/01/autumn-2009-graphics-card-buyers-guide/5
How come there haven't been any early benchmarks of Metro 2033 though? The game is due out on Tuesday right? Normally by now there would've been something.
bit-tech agrees with me The 4890 in their testing is on par with the gtx 260. The x2 is 1 fps faster than thegtx 260. The gtx 285 is a good 14fps faster.
As for metro who knows
Similar threads
