8GB 4070 for $600+ in 2022 is bonkers. Probably $650+. The damn 3060 had 12GB.
But it used not to, 3060 Laptop and DT both were GA106.The table I think you are referring to is for mobile in which everything is down shifted one die
But it used not to, 3060 Laptop and DT both were GA106.
Same with 3070(Ti).
Which is a really, really bad idea if you want to achieve any sort of generational uplift.I was referring to this specific generation in which everything seems to be shifted down one die compared to desktop.
I see. Really hope that’s true.The table I think you are referring to is for mobile in which everything is down shifted one die, so RTX 4070 mobile uses AD106. This matches last gen mobile. RTX 3060 mobile also was limited to only a 6GB config, and so x60 and downwards looks like it will get VRAM increases.
RTX 4070 on desktop is rumored to still use AD104 with a 192-bit memory bus and therefore 12GB of VRAM. Currently also rumored to be 46 SMs (vs 60).
It is.I see. Really hope that’s true.
Now I can't find mention of the cache config on NVIDIA's website. Seems they may have removed it.
Thanks. They corrected the 4070 Super specs there but the 4070Ti Super remains 48MB. Could still be wrong though.They were only ever listed in the news post for the GPUs and not the actual GPU pages.
GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Series Graphics Cards Launching This January, For Supercharged Gaming & Creating, With Super-Fast AI
The new GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER graphics cards launch throughout the month, beginning with the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on January 17th, starting at $599.www.nvidia.com
Not really. Card is scaling pretty much identically to 4070 in all resolutions. You could attribute that to the increase in effective b/w of course but then you'd have to assume that it affects something like 1080p too.Are there any benchmarks where the 4070 Super takes an outsized lead over the 4070, more than the increase in compute would account for?
Yea I haven't noticed any instances of unexpected scaling either.Not really. Card is scaling pretty much identically to 4070 in all resolutions. You could attribute that to the increase in effective b/w of course but then you'd have to assume that it affects something like 1080p too.
Thanks. They corrected the 4070 Super specs there but the 4070Ti Super remains 48MB. Could still be wrong though.
Are there any benchmarks where the 4070 Super takes an outsized lead over the 4070, more than the increase in compute would account for? I'm wondering how much difference the extra 12MB makes for AD104.
Yes, there are a small handful of games where it shows a surprising lead over the 4070. Like this:Are there any benchmarks where the 4070 Super takes an outsized lead over the 4070, more than the increase in compute would account for?
First results for 4070TiS are somewhat unimpressive at least:Thanks. They corrected the 4070 Super specs there but the 4070Ti Super remains 48MB. Could still be wrong though.
Are there any benchmarks where the 4070 Super takes an outsized lead over the 4070, more than the increase in compute would account for? I'm wondering how much difference the extra 12MB makes for AD104.
It's still the card I probably would've gotten had it existed back in March. When I look at the entire 4000 series lineup I end of at the 4070Ti Super as the most sensible option for the mid-high end.First results for 4070TiS are somewhat unimpressive at least:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070Ti SUPER is 8% faster on average than RTX 4070Ti in 3DMark tests - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti SUPER shows 8% higher performance on average in 3DMark tests While the RTX 4070 SUPER showed a large increase in performance compared to the RTX 4070, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER appears to offer a smaller improvement. Reviewers are currently conducting tests on the RTX 4070 Ti...videocardz.com
That's an interesting theory. On power limited cards, having more L2 would have benefits beyond simply faster access to memory. Since accessing L2 costs less energy you can clock higher in the same power budget.I wonder if the increased cache and associated higher hit rate here has a benefit in terms of efficiency (lower energy going to L2 vs. VRAM).
I suspect it will still do alright as 16GB has been propped up as a bit of a psychological barrier vis a vis current gen console conversions.It's still the card I probably would've gotten had it existed back in March. When I look at the entire 4000 series lineup I end of at the 4070Ti Super as the most sensible option for the mid-high end.
Yea but I think it's more than a psychological barrier. 12GB on the 4070 was not enough for me in Hogwarts Legacy at 1080p Ultra without upscaling. It's fine for a few minutes but then FPS goes way down. I had to turn textures to high and then it was stable.I suspect it will still do alright as 16GB has been propped up as a bit of a psychological barrier vis a vis current gen console conversions.
There will certainly be some real edge cases where the 12GB models will have a comparatively larger dropoff.