4090Ti has full cache (96MB instead of 72MB on 4090) 2k more shaders (for 18176), official boost clock of 2.75Ghz (2.95 typ gaming) to reach this sweet 100TFOPS marketing achievement, and faster 24Gb/s memory. Out of the box, it's 10~20% faster than 4090. Launch can be anytime. It will depend on Navi31 perf...
What about simply overclocking the memory without any change to voltages or core clock?
i dont know if anyone has mentioned it , but i assume there will be some clock stretching going on as you lower voltage, just like Zen 1/2/3/4 will do. So you have to be carefull and always measure performance
350W part is called 4080.
That's an understatement.
Of course they could. There was never remotely any need for such high power draw. Even at 270w, this would have been a fantastic performer.
Do they plan to do anything about it or are they just aware of it and cool with it?
Memory seems pretty easily overclockable on these GPUs. My memory is at 24Gbps... so a 4090Ti with 24Gbps memory seems very likely.
Kinda glad I got the MSI Gaming X Trio which only comes with the 3 prong connector and the 106% power limit.
Have you checked what memory the card actually use? Won't be surprised if it's 24Gbps modules.
Yea they definitely could have. The cooling on this thing is WAY overengineered for what's required... BUT I am loving that fact that my GPU never leaves the 50-60'C range, and is insanely quiet.
But it won’t perform within 5% of the performance of the 4090.
Nope. I have no idea. I thought it was 21Gbps Micron memory.. but it could be rated higher.
Yes but current designs are fucked.
It's also a lot cheaper to make so...
www.3dmark.com
I can't tell what is shown in that page - all four results appear to say the memory clock is the same (2235MHz - is that right?). And no frame rate or power - so hard to compare with what you showed before...Result
Stock -> Memory OC Only (+1500) -> Core OC Only (+260) -> Both
Much bigger gains with memory OC.
