2x GK110 @ ~700MHz: http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/03/25/titan-z/
If you are not put it under water and overclock it a Titan Black / 780 Ti @ 1,3GHz Boost would probably in the same perfomance range.
this one at 600$ vs. 3000$......
2x GK110 @ ~700MHz: http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/03/25/titan-z/
If you are not put it under water and overclock it a Titan Black / 780 Ti @ 1,3GHz Boost would probably in the same perfomance range.
$3K! This is gonna really throw off the GK110 per Dollar metric!
I think a single GK110 Tesla card is on the order of $4000. This thing is a bargain if all you need are CUDA DP flops. I don't think there's any question that this thing is not for gaming.That's a preposterous amount of money for a gaming card, but what about GPGPU? How would it compare against Teslas in terms of value?
I think a single GK110 Tesla card is on the order of $4000. This thing is a bargain if all you need are CUDA DP flops. I don't think there's any question that this thing is not for gaming.
If this is case, why not 2 titan black for 2k$?
The reasons mentioned just above. And maybe (quite likely actually) that the Z uses binned parts that have lower power consumption? So better overall perf/W. To be seen... Not sure if that really matters for a workstation though.If this is case, why not 2 titan black for 2k$?
Humm.. then when Jen Hsu Huang said 3 Titan Zs would be 3 GPUs then it wasn't really like that.
Because that takes 2 PCI-E slots and your workstation may only have one. Or if it has two, this means you can get 4 GK110 chips in there as opposed to 2.
You seriously believe these cards can be stacked side by side and not cook...? They must use a helluva lot of power, and there's not a lot of space between two cardslots. That fan's going to be mighty strangled, methinks.Or if it has two, this means you can get 4 GK110 chips in there as opposed to 2.
More of a pro GPU than consumer as far as I can tell. It's not designed for running Crysis 2 on!
Really? Why not? What about Crysis 3?
Seriously, I don't see a point why we take this argument seriously. The more power for the games, the better.
BTW, if not as you say, what card do you suggest for playing games (future ones including) with minimum 60 FPS, for example?
I also think 3000 is too much... why not 2500?
You seriously believe these cards can be stacked side by side and not cook...? They must use a helluva lot of power, and there's not a lot of space between two cardslots. That fan's going to be mighty strangled, methinks.
Really? Why not? What about Crysis 3?
Seriously, I don't see a point why we take this argument seriously. The more power for the games, the better.
BTW, if not as you say, what card do you suggest for playing games (future ones including) with minimum 60 FPS, for example?
I also think 3000 is too much... why not 2500?
"Binned for efficiency" is a relative term. It's still a hugely power-hungry GPU and the available space for air intake doesn't get bigger just because the GPUs are downclocked a bit.Since they're supposed to run at about 700Mhz (slow) and are likely binned for power efficiency, I don't see any reason for them to run particularly hot.
It's quite clever to price it this high: this way, it really screams 'professional only' and allows them to maneuver away from a competitive and much cheaper AMD offering if so required, while allowing some Arabian sheiks to buy it for a gaming rig.I'll wager when the dual 290x launches NV don't lower the price to compete (and Titan Z will probably be slower to boot).