Holy sh*t. I make a sardonic, off-the-cuff remark, and you guys analyze it like I'd just published a dissertation.
But as for your analysis, the problem with all the examples you cited is that the form is unrelated to the function. The form is pure novelty. A game controller doesn't share that essential trait. Unlike a PC-in-a-toaster, the PS3 controller doesn't look the way it does because its appearance is supposed to merely amusing. It's supposed to look like a video game controller because it is a video game controller. The form is the function. If MS and Sony really wanted people to think of the machines as media centers with gaming as merely one of many possibilities, the controller is merely one of many things they would have done differently. There would have been no 360 even available without a hard drive, and the Premium wouldn't have had a mere 20 GB. They wouldn't have blown so much money on the CPU/GPU. You wouldn't need a Tivo...seriously, a TV-connected "media center" that can't record from the TV? The 360 wouldn't have limited DVD playback to 480p (has this changed?), which according to reviewers is some of the worst quality playback $400 can buy, and probably would have used the money they wasted on the graphics chip to ship with an HD-DVD player. Rather than the media remote being an optional peripheral and the game controller being standard, it would have been the other way around.
Whether you look at the form, the silicon, the marketing, or the software, it's quite clear that the #1 reason X360 and PS3 exist is to play video games.
But as for your analysis, the problem with all the examples you cited is that the form is unrelated to the function. The form is pure novelty. A game controller doesn't share that essential trait. Unlike a PC-in-a-toaster, the PS3 controller doesn't look the way it does because its appearance is supposed to merely amusing. It's supposed to look like a video game controller because it is a video game controller. The form is the function. If MS and Sony really wanted people to think of the machines as media centers with gaming as merely one of many possibilities, the controller is merely one of many things they would have done differently. There would have been no 360 even available without a hard drive, and the Premium wouldn't have had a mere 20 GB. They wouldn't have blown so much money on the CPU/GPU. You wouldn't need a Tivo...seriously, a TV-connected "media center" that can't record from the TV? The 360 wouldn't have limited DVD playback to 480p (has this changed?), which according to reviewers is some of the worst quality playback $400 can buy, and probably would have used the money they wasted on the graphics chip to ship with an HD-DVD player. Rather than the media remote being an optional peripheral and the game controller being standard, it would have been the other way around.
Whether you look at the form, the silicon, the marketing, or the software, it's quite clear that the #1 reason X360 and PS3 exist is to play video games.