Basing negative feedback and comments based on comments by people on forums is... is... is just wrong. Unless dealing with a reliable source (interview, 1st person verification, etc) it is best to keep comments, ESPECIALLY those based on what was said by some fruit loop on a forum, to ourselves.X-AleX said:Someone said in another forum.
No, it's a recent build.
Poor for Microsoft...and us
Someone said in another forum.
X-AleX said:Someone said in another forum.
Also, it can't be E3's build, since at E3 they demoed only multiplayer.
Acert93 said:I never said it did not need work. Actually, I said it was stiff and did not look good. I actually dedicated at least a paragraph to that issue.
Seems you just want to argue with me, even if I agree.
Uncle said:Just saw the clips. If they fix the physics / death animations / whatever, I'm ready to pre-order. And I'll probably buy it even if they don't.
pc999 said:Isnt suposed to appear more videos by now
mckmas8808 said:No seems to me you want to argue with me. I actually do agree with you somewhat. You said yourself that the ragdoll physics are over the top. Well I don't like the over the top look. I would like to think that a more realistic death would be better.
seismologist said:I just watched the 5 part video and it didn't looks too bad. At least it looks like a full fledged game and not just a rushed launch demo. But it shows it's last gen roots. Other than the effects I dont see anything that couldn't be done on Xbox.
Id probably buy this game if I were getting a 360 at launch though.
3roxor said:so your post is useless then.
/signedlondon-boy said:Stop bitching you two.