micron said:Will an NV25 run this?
Eh......who needs that stuffHumus said:micron said:Will an NV25 run this?
Nope. It requires pixel and vertex shader 2.0.
Hey, Ante P, can you share some first impressions of that card? Positive or negative? Is it a worthy successor? Thanks...Ante P said:182 fps at 1280x1024 with a yet to be released videocard.
madshi said:Hey, Ante P, can you share some first impressions of that card? Positive or negative? Is it a worthy successor? Thanks...
Thanks... :?Ante P said:I'd sum it up as pretty boring.
Sxotty said:Why would you get more frames in a window than fullscreen? Is that at the same resolution?
It was the resolution the window defaulted to when I first started the demo, ie. 792x566.Humus said:Sxotty said:Why would you get more frames in a window than fullscreen? Is that at the same resolution?
The windowed resolution is whatever you resize your window to, and it's stored across sessions and across demos. So stating the windowed performance is pretty useless unless you state what windowed resolution you're using, which is written in the title bar btw.
bbyybb said:I have a radeon r9700 pro and it is telling me i only have a Pixel Shader 1.0 and Vertex shader 2.0 so it will not work.
I have the latest catalyst drivers. Anyone know what is going on?
Cheers,
bbyybb.