I believe I already answered that question.
MS guarantees that Xbox 360 games will look better than PS3!
- Thread starter rabidrabbit
- Start date
- Status
I believe I already answered that question.
He didnt speak specifically about exclusive games either
Thats your own assumption. We are talking about games in general avoiding wether they are exclusive or not
You still miss the point here. I already said there is no reason to disagree that some games look better like for example GRAW vs RR6. As I said what the point was that he cant come up with the conclusion that 360 has the upper hand when PS3 titles of the same games get enhancements. Nothing less nothing more. This is an indication that devs get familiar with the PS3
I fail to understand what is the point you are trying to make. That 360 has an uper hand for real or that 360 is more capable?
Problem is you just compared 2 different genres, that are available on the same platform.
Reisistance looks miles better. Ofcourse that could be just me. Just as Kameo looking better could be just you. I can also name you a 360 launch game that impressed me more than Kameo too. COD2. Yeah I liked it more.
Last edited by a moderator:
I can already see many of the same Kutaragi bashers defending this no-name "Teversham" character on his antics this time.
And I can see many of the Kutaragi apologists calling for lawsuits and such over these claims.
The door swings both ways.
.............
All this arguing base on one of the most provocative PRwe've seen for a long time is annoying.
For the first gen Ps3 and second gen xbox, all I can say is the only ms game that compete in developpement time is gow, most first gen ps3 title are in developpement for way more time than most of second gen xbox titles. ANd some of then are likely to miss chrissmass.
But I guess see always what they want.
Do the best looking games we will know soon now,no need of commenting PR, reality will hit in a month and something.
The only thing sure for me is that both system look close enought to me to make my choice base on game not on graphics, everybody should be happy, instead of fighting pointless pr..
All this arguing base on one of the most provocative PRwe've seen for a long time is annoying.
For the first gen Ps3 and second gen xbox, all I can say is the only ms game that compete in developpement time is gow, most first gen ps3 title are in developpement for way more time than most of second gen xbox titles. ANd some of then are likely to miss chrissmass.
But I guess see always what they want.
Do the best looking games we will know soon now,no need of commenting PR, reality will hit in a month and something.
The only thing sure for me is that both system look close enought to me to make my choice base on game not on graphics, everybody should be happy, instead of fighting pointless pr..
Powerkeg said:
3roxor said:
Logically, i think that would mean ALL of them? Not that i agree, but from a linguistic point of view i think it's easy to see what he means.
I think Resistance has really come through and looks better than Kameo, from what i've seen.
But this is once again a case of "beauty in the eye of the beholder" so i'm not sure how fruitful this discussion can be...
Technically and artistically Kameo is way beyond COD2... however it is apparent that you prefer frenetic FPS'... thus you are talking a genre preference not a technical or artistic difference in reality. Whole different conversation.
Last edited by a moderator:
In this thread? "I would still put Kameo against anything I've seen for the PS3 launch." I want to hear you name specific titles but you probably won't..
People calling out for Lawsuits over this must belong to a very different dimension... How would the case be fought?? Screenshots and videos as "evidence"??
Come on, get a grip. It's just silly PR, nothing more nothing less.
Soon Sony will come out with another silly comment on how Bluetooth makes games look better, and Nintendo will come out saying that Wii won't care about the graphics when we get our hands on their "revolutionary" games.
People need to realise that everything we hear or read from these people is PR. All kind of public speaking or press release is PR, meaning it goes through some analysis of what to say, how to say it and when to say it to ensure that people will be interested in your product.
Come on, get a grip. It's just silly PR, nothing more nothing less.
Soon Sony will come out with another silly comment on how Bluetooth makes games look better, and Nintendo will come out saying that Wii won't care about the graphics when we get our hands on their "revolutionary" games.
People need to realise that everything we hear or read from these people is PR. All kind of public speaking or press release is PR, meaning it goes through some analysis of what to say, how to say it and when to say it to ensure that people will be interested in your product.
Actually I dont own a single FPS. I am not a fan of that genre and never were.
I am actually the opposite. I tend to like games more when they have an artistic sense. I dont like the art direction of neither Kameo or COD2.
As i explained, logically if he says that nothing on PS3 is on the same level as Kameo, the answer you'll get is: All of them don't look as good as Kameo.
Same goes for you. I'm not going to debate this highly speculative stuff you wrote there.
No, he made an overall statement, which means the obvious comparison is the best vs. the best, not the worst vs. improved versions of the worst.
No, you are flat out wrong here, and I'm assuming that since you edited out the first part of that statement that you already know exactly why you are wrong.
We were talking about using only multipletform games in order to get an "apples to apples" comparison. Excluding the exclusive games. You are obviously well aware of that, which is why you had to edit out the comment before making your claim that I was assuming something.
Clearly I wasn't assuming anything, and you are just trying to make a defense through creative editing, rather than debating the truth.
Lame.
Try that again and see if you can be more clear next time.
"As I said what he was point it as is that "
WTF??? What are you trying to say here?
That I agree with the original claim made by the MS rep. All of it, not just the first sentence which was quoted. (Slightly out of context I might add)
Problem is you apparently don't know the difference between an example and a point.
Nobody asked which you like more, the whole issue revolves around graphics. Pure and simple.
And you can't seriously be trying to say CoD2 had better graphics than Kameo.
Yes, but for full effect I want him to name Motorstorm, Resistance etc you see..
Yes, I answered that in this thread. And if you would read my posts then you would realize why I'm not going to bother making a list.
And if you were really clever you might just figure out not only my answer, but why I expect you to come up with specific examples if you wish to deny my statement.
What "full effect" are you looking for?
The one where we all say "Look everyone, 3roxor is playing dumb" effect?
Thanks, I think that I got my answer from you now..
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
