Svensk Viking
Regular
Exactly. Tolkien himself knew that some things didn't match or had a proper connection between the two books. Heck, how can you even imagine that a cheap wizard only able to perform a few tricks in The Hobbit was nothing less than a powerful Maiar in LOTR?
According to those who've read all of Tolkien's books, the wizards were only "allowed" to use their power under certain circumstances, so I guess that could excuse that.
Their mission was mainly to support the free peoples against Sauron, not fight the war directly themselves with their supernatural power, and I don't think Gandalf showed his power except from the Nazgul and Balrog encounters.
Talking Jackson's work, I do like the first film most. Despite the changes, it felt like it didn't deviate from the book too much. The changes in TT and Rotk annoyed me more and they also felt drawn out sometimes.
In terms of atmosphere, I do like the 1978 film the most. It greatly catches that sense of doom, which I think wasn't there at all in Jackson's films.
Though both The Hobbit 1977 and Rotk 1980 settled for the more childish look.
Last edited: