You’re right regarding the list, but it was just a partial list offered to anyone who may want to get some exposure to the other side of the argument in order to make an objective assessment. And I’m definitely not saying man-made global warming is a farce, I just believe there is reason to believe that the science may not be completely 100% accurate.
Here’s something to think about:
1) In the early seventies the scientific consensus was that we were heading into another ice age and scientific leaders were frustrated that the government would not heed their alarmist concerns. (Sound familiar.)
2) Lead scientists sounded the alarm erroneously predicting a nuclear winter effect due to the burning of Kuwaiti oil fields. (See earlier post)
Now what’s that saying? “Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. Fool me thrice....”
Of course if they’re right THIS time....
Take care all. I’m done posting in this thread.
[font="]-aldo[/font]
1 & 2 were never scientific consensus. Your style of argument (ie. cherry picking) sounds like how creationist argue evolution is wrong. Anyone who has participated in the peer reviewed scientific process knows how much a joke a global conspiracy perpetrated by scientist is.