Maybe kind of sort of in relation to the topic
New games publisher and developer New Tales established - Gematsu
New games publisher and developer New Tales established - Gematsu
I would assume the development teams and tools have some material value. IW Engine is cutting edge, cross platform and fast with a proven tool chain that at least 3 teams are well versed in. Also, does Activision or Blizzard not own some real estate? I can't imagine a company that size doesn't own one of it's many campus.$69 billion seems an awful lot to spend on something that has no real material value, somewhat like the worth given to bit coin. They've paid an extraordinary amount of money for some very successful franchise names, but have no real way of guaranteeing their future success, that's down to a few key developers, who are free to leave at any time; maybe forming another studio and creating a better product. A few bad games, a few missteps and the value of the studio could plummet.
They left long before the talks with Microsoft even started.Maybe kind of sort of in relation to the topic
New games publisher and developer New Tales established - Gematsu
They left long before the talks with Microsoft even started.
Maybe kind of sort of in relation to the topic
New games publisher and developer New Tales established - Gematsu
This move has a lot of implications even outside the game dev itself.They've paid an extraordinary amount of money for some very successful franchise names, but have no real way of guaranteeing their future success, that's down to a few key developers, who are free to leave at any time; maybe forming another studio and creating a better product.
Oh, I see. It just feels like this API never took off properly.Windows Mixed reality is as good as any of the platforms. The downfall is they farmed out the building to oems and because of that headsets had varying levels of tech and build quality. HP makes great windows mixed reality headsets. MS also has some amazing vr and ar tech internally that I haven't seen else where. If Microsoft wanted to release a headset for the xbox series x they could do so easily. They have the tecnology , the only thing that may lack is controllers but even there the xbox team can do some great thing . The kinect azure tech is some of the best machine vision techology out there.
Ive been wondering why Sony doubles down on VR so much, it seems a really hard market to expand upon. At the same time its good that someone is considering it for serious gaming atleast. Right now we only have HL Alyx thats a worthy VR game. If Sony can inspire others for more of that kind of games its nice. As said, someone has to start with it.
It's a differentior as a competitor. I used to what their Aibo when I was younger. I'm not paying 3 grand for a robot dog though, lol.
With the amount of studios that they have, they could throw an honest attempt at VR but I say this even owning both PSVR1, a Quest 2 and intending on getting PSVR2 day one, console attempts are going to be varying degrees niche if they have the need to be tethered to the console, literally and figuratively. I used my Quest 2 to play walkabout golf today and the freedom is unparalleled.
I think at one point it was like 15% of headsets on steam.Oh, I see. It just feels like this API never took off properly.
Yeah, I believe that wireless VR is a way to go.With the amount of studios that they have, they could throw an honest attempt at VR but I say this even owning both PSVR1, a Quest 2 and intending on getting PSVR2 day one, console attempts are going to be varying degrees niche if they have the need to be tethered to the console, literally and figuratively. I used my Quest 2 to play walkabout golf today and the freedom is unparalleled.
Yeah, I believe that wireless VR is a way to go.
I don't think anyone disagrees.
For PSVR it's a matter of cost. Eventually wireless will stop being prohibitive. Probably by PSVR3 or optimistically an addon for PSVR2.
Yeah, no. The various wireless technologies differ massively in regard to this. I.e microwaves benefits massively for clear line between points but bluetooth signal propogation is entirely depended on the ability to bounce signals around and open space is a killer for bluetooth. For 3G, 4G and 5G signals, yes. But wifi generally not. There are things that kill 2.4ghz and 5ghz signals like wafer, steel or lead, but otherwise line of sight is less of an issue.Wireless has its own problems. Even with the faster connections you need line of sight to maximize connection speeds.
Isn't this the minimum what people expected?
Let's goooo
https://news.blizzard.com/en-us/blizzard/23768911/create-a-new-universe-with-us
Blizzard is embarking on our next quest. We are going on a journey to a whole new universe, home to a brand-new survival game for PC and console. A place full of heroes we have yet to meet, stories yet to be told, and adventures yet to be lived. A vast realm of possibility, waiting to be explored.