Matrix Revolution!

Clashman said:
Persephone: A kiss.
Trinity: Excuse me?
Persephone: I want you to kiss me as if you were kissing her.
Neo: Why?
Persephone: You love her; she loves you; it's all over you both. A long time ago, I knew what that felt like. I want to remember it; I want to sample it. That's all, just a sample.

Smith: Thank you. But, as you well know appearances can be deceiving which brings me back to the reason why we're here. We're not here because we're free, we're here because we're not free. There's no escaping reason, no denying purpose because as we both know, without purpose we would not exist.
Smith 2: It is purpose that created us.
Smith 3: Purpose that connects us.
Smith 4: Purpose that pulls us.
Smith 5: That guides us.
Smith 6: That drives us.
Smith 7: It is purpose that defines.
Smith 8: Purpose that binds us.
Smith: We are here because of you, Mr. Anderson. We're here to take from you what you tried to take from us, purpose.

Neo: Go...Hiya fellas.
Agent Johnson: It's him.
Agent Thompson: The anomaly
Agent Jackson: Do we proceed?
Agent Thompson: Yes,
Agent Jackson: He is still
Agent Johnson: Only human.
Neo: Hmmm, upgrades.

What's so bad about all those? Maybe they're not Shakespeare, but I don't see how anyone could consider those to be so bad that they ruin the movie. The first one reinforces Trinity & Neo's love, necessary for the audience since neither character's personality is openly expressive about it. The second is another take on the causality argument that all the major Matrix programs make. And the third, I assume you're referring to the "hiya fellas" part, which is legit, but the agents at least are going through a machine decision-making process, as demonstrated by their "trialogue". If you were script writer, what would you have written instead?
 
If bad dialog concerns you, just watch Star Wars: Episode 2 just prior to seeing the new Matrix movie.

You'll be so desensitised, you'll not notice any foibles in the Matrix.

And Kill Bill to handle the overly long kung fu scenes.
 
I think I'd rather spend my money watching a good movie than watching a truly god-awful movie just so that I can stomach one that's only terrible.

Anyone seen Dirty Pretty Things? Now that was a good movie. Depressing as hell, but a good flick nonetheless.
 
I really hope they wont go for that extra layer shit, because that way lies madness ... the recursion of simulated realities plot is like recursive timetravel plots, only good for short stories IMO.

Personally I would appreciate if the battery shit was misdirection (although the leap of faith required that the inhabitants of Zion could be misdirected by something so ludicrous is a bit too much ... but what is done is done). IMO the most acceptable, although rather obvious, twist would be for the human brains being used as the computer in which the AIs now live ... the need for the simulation and a messianic figure with his disciples to keep the simulation stable is a reasonable premise. His ability to influence the bots IRL could be explained by them never really having been fully plugged out, since their escape was planned they might still be connected by wireless.

This still requires lots of leaps of faith, but adding an extra layer of simulation would just piss me off ... the point has been made in the first movie, no need to belabor it. It is not that special a revelation.
 
RussSchultz said:
If bad dialog concerns you, just watch Star Wars: Episode 2 just prior to seeing the new Matrix movie.

lol. true, true. I just saw it again this weekend on HBO, and the scenes when Anakin and Padme are trying to be lovy-dovy are just physically painfull.
 
MfA said:
IMO the most acceptable, although rather obvious, twist would be for the human brains being used as the computer in which the AIs now live ...
Read the "Hyperion" book.
 
I did, but I have a memory as a sieve. I know I read the first book ... and from the description I might have read Endymion. Is that the one where the religious guys have a cross shaped parasite on their chest they "stole" from some reverted cult of humans which will let their bodies be regenerated? (Which they need because their mode of travel destroys their bodies each time.)
 
Clashman said:
I think I'd rather spend my money watching a good movie than watching a truly god-awful movie just so that I can stomach one that's only terrible.

Anyone seen Dirty Pretty Things? Now that was a good movie. Depressing as hell, but a good flick nonetheless.

Tell us how you truly feel. I mean, really.
 
fbg1 said:
lol. true, true. I just saw it again this weekend on HBO, and the scenes when Anakin and Padme are trying to be lovy-dovy are just physically painfull.

Agreed. I CHEERED when Ep2 ended, because if it'd gone on one more minute it would've been the first movie I'd ever stopped watching out of pure disgust.



You know, it almost seems to me like Clashman is just trying to troll, because for one his three blocks of 'awful dialogue' had no problems at all, and for another he's really been stretching his arguments pretty thin.

Oh, and btw:

fbg1 said:
While I "got" most of the movie and appreciated the underlying philosophical conflicts the dialog attempted to illuminate to the audience, I didn't get the part about everyone being 25 years old. I got the impression that The One comes along every few generations, ~100 years, and that since the current Zion inhabitants don't realize there have been 5 Zion's before, they think they have been fighting the machines for only about 100 years, as Morhpeus says in his speech in the cave. So why exactly is everyone in Zion 25 years old? Also, not everyone is 25 - Locke and the council members, as well as Captain Soren and some of the other ship crews are older. Or is it b/c they don't take anyone out of the Matrix after a certain age (Neo being an exception), adding a bias for youth to the population of Zion?

Bingo. Watch the first Matrix again. They even made a semi-big deal about them pulling Neo out despite him being well over the acceptible age for removal.

And one more thing:

Bogotron said:
And sometimes "the machines" are ridiculously stupid.... If they want to wipe out Zion, why send a million of those bad octopus rejects and not 5-6 nukes in the megaton range? Simpler and probably a lot more cost-effective. They are under ground after all, ever heard of a cave-in?
Nuking a site from orbit is the only way of being sure...

They aren't trying to "wipe out" Zion, just kill everyone in it. Think back to how the "One" system operates and what occurrs every time a "One" appears.

Added: Oh, and wrt those last two quotes: So much for you people 'getting it'... I only saw Reloaded once and the first Matrix twice.
 
Then planet being covered in machines there might serious damage to infrastructure (especially underground) with the use of nukes...
 
It's alarming how many people say the Matrix is a bad movie because the science doesn't make sense.

Yeah, like a starship that magically bends the laws of space and time does. Or the idea of hyperspace.

It doesn't have to make sense--christ. It's Comic-Book-Guy-itis. The science doesn't matter--the Matrix series is not science fiction per se--it's basically trying to make a film out of various philosophical viewpoints.

And THAT is why you have to watch it repeatedly. Because no, you will not get it the first time you watch it.
 
It doesnt make it a bad movie, it just would have been a better movie without the immersion destroying stupidity of that particular concept.

Suspense of disbelief gets easier the easier something is to believe.
 
Bogotron said:
And sometimes "the machines" are ridiculously stupid.... If they want to wipe out Zion, why send a million of those bad octopus rejects and not 5-6 nukes in the megaton range?

Because if they had uranium they could build a nuclear reactor and would not need human batteries, of course ;) . Personally I find that if I do not “check my brain at the doorâ€￾ I would not enjoy a great deal of movies nowadays. It also helps explain why Star Ship Troopers is one of my favs.
 
MfA said:
I did, but I have a memory as a sieve. I know I read the first book ... and from the description I might have read Endymion. Is that the one where the religious guys have a cross shaped parasite on their chest they "stole" from some reverted cult of humans which will let their bodies be regenerated? (Which they need because their mode of travel destroys their bodies each time.)
Now I can answer it properly. Endymion is a sequel of the Hyperion :)
If I understand this review correctlly the sequence is http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue52/excess.html

Hyperion (1989)
The Fall of Hyperion (1990)
Endymion (1995)
The Rise of Endymion (1997)

Could classic Sci Fi books become good movies?
 
pascal said:
Could classic Sci Fi books become good movies?


hell yeah!!! of course!!! all you need is a director who doesn't go all Spielberg on us (although i must say he has done some very good movies) and as long as he doesnt go all LOST-IN-SPACE on us. there are MANY wonderful sci-fi books out there that would make really good movies.
 
london-boy said:
pascal said:
Could classic Sci Fi books become good movies?


hell yeah!!! of course!!! all you need is a director who doesn't go all Spielberg on us (although i must say he has done some very good movies) and as long as he doesnt go all LOST-IN-SPACE on us. there are MANY wonderful sci-fi books out there that would make really good movies.

I do wish that Hollywood would stop trying to convert old TV shows into movies, and start looking at the wealth of material out there in the form of SF Books.
Unfortunatly, some of the very best SF books would make very poor films, especially after being mangled by Hollywood down to a 90 minute flick.

Look at a classic like "Ringworld". That actually has a story that would be very suited to a 3 hour film, but could easily be turned into a travesty.
 
I think novellas or even short stories are better suited to adaption than novels.

I thought Bladerunner wasnt that bad an attempt, it's an almost complete rewrite of course ... but they still managed to take away a lot of the good concepts from the original story, and that the original parts didnt suck helped too.

Of course that kind of adaption can go horribly wrong too, as examplified by Freejack (it has a guy who is in a car accident and is catapulted to the future ... there is a random black guy ... there is a spirit switchboard ... that is the extent of the similarity with the original story, the fact that all the original parts of the movie absolutely suck doesnt help). The guy who adapted Immortality Inc into that travesty (or whoever forced him to adapt it like that) should be banned from ever working on a movie again.
 
Back
Top