BlueTsunami said:I'm still waiting on hey69 to make an appearence. I want to hear what HE has to say (or she, but I think he is a he).
what if hey69 is a e?
BlueTsunami said:I'm still waiting on hey69 to make an appearence. I want to hear what HE has to say (or she, but I think he is a he).
mckmas8808 said:So Tap In why is this a big selling point for the Nintendo Revolution? Nintendo is bragging stating that you can play Nintendo games dated back to the NES. If people didn't care, then why were people happy when they heard this?
hey69 said:ok guys you all have been owned !
xbdestroya said:No no - DON'T make the owls standard! I mean I love them, but it just robs completely the seriousness associated with any thread they enter. And for the most part, I do prefer the serious threads afterall...
Industry observers believe Warner and Paramount are hedging their bets with their moves on the chance that Sony will not be able to deliver as robust a product as they say in the timeframe they promise -- mid-2006 either slightly before or after the introduction of Sony's PlayStation 3, which will incorporate Blu-ray as well.
If Sony delivers, many studio execs say that Warner and Paramount will likely abandon the HD DVD platform. If not, media companies are under such pressure to deliver a new product to revive double-digit growth of pre-recorded movies, that they will go ahead with Toshiba's format.
One studio exec says that engineers re-evaluated the Blu-ray technology as recently as this week and concluded that it will not be ready to offer everything Sony promises for two more years.
Nesh said:Btw is BR a Sony only patent?If not what other companies were involved and invested on the BR?
The studios propel consumers to one format over another through compelling content. Hence, BD is the early favorite b/c they have all the studios except Universal. Plus more hardware backers to boot. Is this point even debateable anymore? The needle has been swinging further and further in BD's direction with each new announcement. It's fairly open and shut at this point, no? PEACE.scooby_dooby said:The consumers decision will depend on price and availability.
THe movie companies will support whatever the consumer supports, not vice versa.
PS3 to jettison backwards compatibility in order to launch this decade? Taking a tilt at the rumor mill. [update1]
Related entries: Nintendo Revolution, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
Here’s the full text of an Xbox rumor ******tasy that Sony is ready to ditch backwards-compatibility in order to get the PS3 out the door in the spring (Japan) and fall (USA, Europe) of next year.
Nice stuff leaked right into my drive: In order to meet launch in spring the ps3 will feature a drive that will only be able to read single layer BD disks and will not be compatible with DVD and CDROM’s This means that backwards compatibility is sacrificed in order to reach launch date Another problem sony is facing now is a backlash from the movie industry who want multilayer disks for additional content, these disks will not be playable on the ps3 PS3 lauch spring : only Japan (so the strange drives with no backward comp would only affect these machines! Probably not even all of them!) autumn /summer: USA, october november: PAL
Really, this is just hogwash, but even if it’s fabricated there are still some nuggets of truth in it. As a general product development strategy, dropping features can accelerate launch timelines assuming that it doesn’t take longer to yank a feature out than it would take to finish shoehorning it in.
It’s not just Sony, either. We’ve actually heard numerous indications that Microsoft was really leaning on developers to cut game features in order to have a broad list of launch titles available for the release of the Xbox 360. That’s why some fans and critics have noticed that some upcoming games for the Xbox 360 aren’t all that visually impressive.
Update: it’s fake. There will be surprises unveiled about both the Xbox and PS3, to be sure. The best we can do is keep our eyes open.