It’s unclear who or what you’re ranting against.
Against the infinite on-going onslaught of nVidia fanboys that constantly infest every single thread about AMD, which was the reason this thread was created in the first place. It's like fighting a zombie armada. And sorry, but if you walk talk and quack like a zombie, you'll get shot with the arguments that all other zombies are using.
Nearly all your responses to me have nothing to do with anything I said.
How so? I've quoted you directly and replied specifically to your statements. For example, I clearly debunked your presumption that DLSS criticism evaporated overnight because FSR came out. It was due to completely different reasons. But you ignored that completely and didn't bother replying. I guess you don't own up to your mistakes and have an avoidance issue when wrong.
And I asked you some things that you ignored too, like:
"I'd love to hear where the lack of RT has consequences. "
*insert rolling ball of hay here*
At no point did I say AMD hardware can’t do RT or that you can’t play RT games on a 7900 XT or that RT is important for gameplay. You’re tossing around a ton of straw men so it’s hard to understand what exactly you’re upset about.
I dislike dishonesty and false narratives. And a lot of those are being propagated that damage the gaming market and ultimately gamers.
I’ll make it easy for you. My main argument is that RT naysayers
Look at that language... "RT naysayers". What is that exactly? Define that for me please. Or are you going to ignore that request too?
My main argument is that RT naysayers for the past 5 years have not offered viable alternatives yet still continue to complain about RT like it’s the root of all of our problems.
RT is not the root of all our problems. But the pushers of RT are.
If you don’t like RT for whatever reason then turn it off. If you think RT is inefficient then show evidence of alternative tech that achieves the same result.
You are conflating things and you argue by trying to bypass premises and have them secretly be assumed by everyone. First thing's first. RT is definitely NOT required to enjoy playing games, any more than 4K is required to enjoy playing games. Considering that the majority of gamers are still on 1600 - 3600 class cards, this naturally means that the majority are enjoying gaming without RT or 4K. So your hidden premise that an alternative tech to RT is
required, is false. Therefore, your request that somehow an alternative tech needs to be shown, because otherwise you can force RT on everyone doesn't fly. It doesn't mean we shouldn't push tech forward, but it definitely doesn't mean that we have to push it on people that don't need or want it either.
Secondly... That the cards are not strong enough to run RT, and that nVidia used RT that ultimately helped mess up the gaming market to fill their pockets, and that RT is being overhyped, does not mean that the tech itself is the problem. It's the ones trying to shove it down everyone else's throats when they clearly don't need it, they are the problem.
All the stuff you spewed at me didn’t have anything to do with the above hence I didn’t bother to reply.
Do you know what this thread is about? Because if anything, it's your arguments that have nothing to do with the thread.
