Trueachievements are reporting on a Monster Energy and Halo Infinite promotion here. It seems to give the price away.
tl;dr
There 200 first prizes of an XSX and a copy of Halo Infinite. The prize pool for first place is $119,998.00 which works out to $599 per console. So minus say $60 for the game you get $549.
Or with the free game, 599.So minus say $60 for the game you get $549.
Trueachievements are reporting on a Monster Energy and Halo Infinite promotion here. It seems to give the price away.
tl;dr
There 200 first prizes of an XSX and a copy of Halo Infinite. The prize pool for first place is $119,998.00 which works out to $599 per console. So minus say $60 for the game you get $549.
Or with the free game, 599.
Trueachievements are reporting on a Monster Energy and Halo Infinite promotion here. It seems to give the price away.
tl;dr
There 200 first prizes of an XSX and a copy of Halo Infinite. The prize pool for first place is $119,998.00 which works out to $599 per console. So minus say $60 for the game you get $539.
We've already talked about this a week ago when AzBat posted this information. https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/2147056/
BTW: Your math is off. $599 - $60 is $539, not $549.
Does tax have to be assed in that value ? I think the highest sales tax is 7% in the USA. So thats another $42. Brings you right down close to $500
If this contest works in PR thats 10.5% for sales tax.
Like I said i dunno. But $500 could be about right
Other thing to mention is in previous give aways MS has given Gold for x amount of time. Perhaps the bundle price accounts for Ultimate
There is no way in hell the contest runners have access to final pricing while retailers do not, and no way that MS has locked in the pricing with retailers without having announced it, this close to launch. That's likely a placeholder value.They also have the disclaimer that the winners will not be paid out the difference from estimated value and actual value.
Don't encourage Spencer!Above $499 would be a bad idea.
Agreed. I think if the price gap is much thinner you insert the scope for delay due to prevarication and you don't want people undecided between multiple products. It should obviously be this, or obviously be that. One S and One X is a good example. Sometimes options and product overlap is good but not when it introduces decision paralysis in the consumer.The SSD alone makes Lockhart viable IMO as long as the price is $200 less than XSX.
if it's 399 and 599 it won't work.
For it to work it has to be at least 100 cheaper than the current XBO-X (after discounts) for it to differentiate.
if it's 399 and 599 it won't work.
For it to work it has to be at least 100 cheaper than the current XBO-X (after discounts) for it to differentiate.
Why? What is the advantage X offers (other than 4K) and the drive?
XSS will have a much better CPU, incredibly fast loading and RT. I think anyone walking into a store with them side by side would be nuts to buy the X unless the X had a price advantage.