How many use Mozilla Firefox and whats your evaluation???

Diplo said:
I note with wry amusement that even MSN are recommending Firefox over IE - lol :LOL:
But for now, there's safety in numbers—the lack of them, that is. Internet Explorer is used by 95 percent of the world. Firefox's fan base adds up to 2 or 3 percent at most. Which browser do you think the Russian hackers are busily trying to break into again?
Once firefox/opera (for that matter linux) become more popular you will see a shift of hackers move from IE to the other software/OS.

epic
 
epicstruggle said:
Diplo said:
I note with wry amusement that even MSN are recommending Firefox over IE - lol :LOL:
But for now, there's safety in numbers—the lack of them, that is. Internet Explorer is used by 95 percent of the world. Firefox's fan base adds up to 2 or 3 percent at most. Which browser do you think the Russian hackers are busily trying to break into again?
Once firefox/opera (for that matter linux) become more popular you will see a shift of hackers move from IE to the other software/OS.

epic

But they won't have the gaping security loophole of ActiveX that IE has. The most serious web page based hacks (including this recent one that prompted the CERT advisory) heavily relies on ActiveX to do it's dirty deeds.
 
epicstruggle said:
Once firefox/opera (for that matter linux) become more popular you will see a shift of hackers move from IE to the other software/OS.
You may well do, and they will find them harder to hack since they don't exhibit the inherent security flaws that IE does.
 
Re: How many use Mozilla Firefox and whats your evaluation??

WolfsBane58 said:
1. The tabed browser feature is an absolutely fantastic idea, IMO. But I've noticed that it has a tendency to hang, (you rightclick on the bookmark and select "open in new tab"), but it doesn't always do this. And it would be very nice to have a setting to open every new window in a new tab without having to go through all this right clicking... it tends to be a pain in the neck.

Tabbed browsing was ripped off from Opera, just like ever other half-decent feature Firefox has.

When I last checked out Firefox a few months ago, there was no way to move the tab bar from the top to the bottom which pissed me off. Opera's UI seems a whole hell of a lot more customizable - or at least cutomizable by by people like me who don't have the patience or competence to edit heaps of config files.

Seriously, who needs Firefox when you can have Opera? Or even IE-front-ends like "Avant Browser" that provide much of the same functionality for IE? Also, Firefox just feels unacceptably slow compared to IE and Opera.

Firefox has still a lot of growing up to do before it becomes viable to me.

Thunderbird in the other hand is pretty nifty if all you want is a simple, no frills mail client. I've been using it for ages.
 
I have to agree, with firefox and mozilla customization is a big issue. One should be able to customize things with greater ease.

I don't wish to pay for a browser nor am I interested in an banner so Firefox still wins. As for Avant, it's UI blows goats, the same with every other IE front-end.
 
epicstruggle said:
Diplo said:
I note with wry amusement that even MSN are recommending Firefox over IE - lol :LOL:
But for now, there's safety in numbers—the lack of them, that is. Internet Explorer is used by 95 percent of the world. Firefox's fan base adds up to 2 or 3 percent at most. Which browser do you think the Russian hackers are busily trying to break into again?
Once firefox/opera (for that matter linux) become more popular you will see a shift of hackers move from IE to the other software/OS.

epic

This is precisely true though.

Everybody raves about how secure linux and so forth are, but the truth is that if hackers were focusing on it as much it too would have many viruses and so forth. at least imho
 
Diplo said:
You may well do, and they will find them harder to hack since they don't exhibit the inherent security flaws that IE does.
How do we know this for sure. If hackers around the world decided to hack/crack linux/firefox they would find ways that you and I would never imagine. Its a fact that hacking windows boxes has a bigger payoff since the larger install base.

epic
 
nutball said:
Humus said:
Yeah, but in FireFox you must click three times. First selects everything, second selects nothing, third you can select parts of it.

Errrr... that's exactly the behaviour I get in IE. It's a Windows thing, all Windows apps act like that (for me at least). They're Windows widgets after all, and Windows is running them. Surely? Or am I missing something?
epicstruggle said:
btw humus, firefox and opera and ie have the same behavior on selecting part of url address.

No, it's different, and that's why I always have trouble copying or deleting parts of the url in FireFox.
To select part of the url in IE you do, click (selects all), click-n-drag to select a part of it.
In FireFox you have to click (selects all), click (selects nothing), click-n-drag to select a part of it.
 
I've been using Mozilla (not FireFox) for quite sometime and have no crashing issues. Maybe I'll try FireFox when it hits version 1.0, but for now I don't see a compelling reason to switch.

Simon F said:
I'm just using the "all in one" Mozilla 1.6.
I love the tabbed browsing, it is just wonderful, especially if you set it to to "open in the background".

The ability to choose exactly which sites can have pop-ups is also a huge plus.

Oh and, err, no ActiveX, I believe.
"open in the background" is my favorite feature as well. Find as you type is great as well.

L233 said:
Tabbed browsing was ripped off from Opera, just like ever other half-decent feature Firefox has.

When I last checked out Firefox a few months ago, there was no way to move the tab bar from the top to the bottom which pissed me off. Opera's UI seems a whole hell of a lot more customizable - or at least cutomizable by by people like me who don't have the patience or competence to edit heaps of config files.

Seriously, who needs Firefox when you can have Opera? Or even IE-front-ends like "Avant Browser" that provide much of the same functionality for IE? Also, Firefox just feels unacceptably slow compared to IE and Opera.

Firefox has still a lot of growing up to do before it becomes viable to me.
A friend of mine just made the same comment about moving the tab bar this weekend so I guess he's not the only one that would like this feature. We need Mozilla/FireFox because to many it is a better option than the others. When I tried Opera it ran very slow on my computer and I didn't like the interface. Mozilla however is very quick for me and I like the "Modern" theme.

Humus said:
In FireFox you have to click (selects all), click (selects nothing), click-n-drag to select a part of it.
Mozilla 1.4 works exactly like you desire. Clicking and releaseing selects all, but clicking and dragging selects a part of the url. A third click is not necessary.
 
I've been using Mozilla (not FireFox) for quite sometime and have no crashing issues. Maybe I'll try FireFox when it hits version 1.0, but for now I don't see a compelling reason to switch.

I've tried to switch from the suite to firefox three times, the third time was the charm. Personally, having the tabs at the top makes way more sense, from a work flow prespective and keeping control components in one area.
 
Humus said:
No, it's different, and that's why I always have trouble copying or deleting parts of the url in FireFox.
To select part of the url in IE you do, click (selects all), click-n-drag to select a part of it.
In FireFox you have to click (selects all), click (selects nothing), click-n-drag to select a part of it.

Ah yes, I see what you mean now.
 
And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.

from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15
 
3dcgi said:
A friend of mine just made the same comment about moving the tab bar this weekend so I guess he's not the only one that would like this feature.
I'm not so fussed about moving the tab bar to the bottom but it would be nice to be able to re-order the tabs.
 
Ace's Hardware said:
If you want tabs on the bottom, there are a extention for it: Tabbrowser Extensions. Its got a truckload of other options too.

Install it and go to the Tab Bar in options to find tabbar placement

http://white.sakura.ne.jp/~piro/xul/_tabextensions.html.en

Just found this over at Ace's. Haven't tried it, YMMV, etc.

From a cursory glance it looks like it'll allow you to move the tab bar to the side/bottom, and re-order the tabs. Don't blame me if it's crap! :D
 
nutball said:
Ace's Hardware said:
If you want tabs on the bottom, there are a extention for it: Tabbrowser Extensions. Its got a truckload of other options too.

Install it and go to the Tab Bar in options to find tabbar placement

http://white.sakura.ne.jp/~piro/xul/_tabextensions.html.en

Just found this over at Ace's. Haven't tried it, YMMV, etc.

From a cursory glance it looks like it'll allow you to move the tab bar to the side/bottom, and re-order the tabs. Don't blame me if it's crap! :D
It's very tempting but the fact they say it could "crush[sic]" your browser inclines me to wait a bit :)
 
epicstruggle said:
How do we know this for sure. If hackers around the world decided to hack/crack linux/firefox they would find ways that you and I would never imagine.
Well, I work as a web developer, so I have a pretty good understanding of the issues involved. The vast majority of IE exploits would NEVER work on any other browser - ActiveX is perhaps the biggest security hole there is and there is NO equivalent in Opera or Mozilla (though I believe Moz is looking at it). Also, the fact that IE is so tightly integrated into the OS is a major inherent weakness. Then the fact IE supports VBscript and Jscript (Microsoft's extended version of Javascript), which are powerful client-side languages, gives exploits easy access to a simple but very powerful scripting language. These are facts, not supposition.
 
Day three of testing. Browsing stability is still pretty good, but I'm still seeing the Menu Bar freezing when I go from regular to full screen window and back. On a side note, I haven't missed IE very much, though some programs keep ask for it in order to download updates... Active X strikes again.

Concerning the Menu Bar... I agree with folks here about needing the ability to move and re-size the bar. May I add that it would also be great if we could introduce an auto hide feature to the menu bar that would only show the tabs on a full time basis, and only pull down the rest of the toolbar when you move your mouse to the edge of the screen that the bar resides.
 
well I am still using .8 and it's good, actually .7 seemed to be evena little bit better... but well .9 I am not even going there :) waiting for 1.0+...
 
I've been using 9.0 and I find that it is the same speed as internet explorer on my connection. Some pages load faster in Internet explorer while others are faster in firefox. I use firefox for my browsing as I like it's interface better than ie's. While ie feels faster, I have found that in reality it is not as ie tends to load more of the page before it is visible while firefox loads very little of the page before it is visible.
 
Back
Top