first r420 review leak

Only on PS2.0. On DX8 games, it wasn't. Point is, if someone could design a 3D pipeline that was 4 pipes, but ran at 2Ghz vs one that was 16 pipes but ran at 500Mhz, and they had equivalent performance, I don't think you could say one was better than the other. Hell, the 2Ghz version might even use far less transistors.
 
trinibwoy said:
ummmmm anager....you gettin a bit too excited there man. hurley was expressing a 'feeling' not that 'nViDiA rulezzz teh OEPNGL!!'.

Excited? Not really. Tired is more like it, and I beg your pardon if it shows too much.
We've been hearing so much about NV owning D3 ( among others... ) due to OpenGL, twin-pumped Z, UltraShadow, whatnot... let's just wait and see is all I'm sayin'. 8)
 
DemoCoder said:
Only on PS2.0. On DX8 games, it wasn't. Point is, if someone could design a 3D pipeline that was 4 pipes, but ran at 2Ghz vs one that was 16 pipes but ran at 500Mhz, and they had equivalent performance, I don't think you could say one was better than the other. Hell, the 2Ghz version might even use far less transistors.

Yes but why would u design a dx 9 card to run dx 9 like crap and dx 8.1 very fast .

You make me laugh with your defence of the nv30. It was crap. They messed up.
 
If these are real we are talking about a craptastic review; sometimes he benches with no AA/AF. Sometimes with 4xAA. Sometimes with 8xAF. Sometimes with both. wtf :?:
 
It is a bit confusing just now. I never use Tom's as a guide to purchasing anything so I must admit Im looking forward to reading more tomorrow. Hopefully some will be using A64.
 
Nothing higher than 4xAA in these tests?????
wtf.gif
 
Back
Top