www.nme.com
Yes I think you’d be right for games like that. But they also don’t require powerhouse computers to run. I mean, people reduce graphic options all the way to 0, gamma to max just to get performance and sight advantages, there’s not really a use case on cloud for PvP, though with cloud if the games are being played from within the same region of xcloud, you should gain some latency there while losing the latency for the actual service.
Well yea, they won’t care, the consumers will I think. No one wants to buy a game and not be able to play it after a certain period of time. The idea of a permanent collection somehow needs to sustain. That’s a cloud problem that needs to be solved.
I don’t think Sony will do it on purpose. It’s not like they push each other to drop their prices further. The realities is that console gaming, or rather performance hardware is just getting so expensive. For a reasonable uplift in silicon performance is going to require more and more quality silicon and cooling.
And people will respond shut up don't care
watch out! Where it said Xbox Series now it says Console, and the Day 1 on Gamepass reference has been removed.
'Fable', 'Avowed' and 'Hellblade 2' pages remove Xbox Game Pass mentions
Rumours about Microsoft abandoning exclusive games continue to grow
agreed. That's sort of the issue with Xbox. And they know it. Everyone knows it. We've talked about it a million times, and the counter argument has always been about MS spending more money to try harder, or make better games. Even if they made the best games over and over and over, very few are going to make the jump. No one wants more than 1 box to play all their games. A few missed out titles here and there is fine, because the majority of peoples purchases are 3rd party games. They want a single sub to do everything, a single place for all their games. This is why Steam continues to dominate, and why Sony will continue to dominate. Nintendo made a strong move into mobile, and have locked that space up. The place for Xbox, is an area where folks want to go as well, in particular, I suspect, people who don't want to have to buy new hardware for games, and just leverage their existing devices for gaming time.
I'd settle for a port of the excellent original game already playable on Xbox. I have so many fond memories by 100% everything on N64. I still have the game on N64 but I'd want that Platinum!Not a new one I hope? As a PS owner you'll have to get used to Microsoft's non release schedule. It's been 16 years since the last one!
I'd settle for a port of the excellent original game already playable on Xbox. I have so many fond memories by 100% everything on N64. I still have the game on N64 but I'd want that Platinum!
also, the fact that they are creating an "exciting" business event is kinda telling. If this wasn't true, Phil Spencer could simply write a statement: "it's not true, there won't be Xbox exclusives running on other platforms". I think becoming third-party without leaving Xbox hardware is the way to go. Backpedaling might make some fans happy, but the Xbox isn't selling, it's a failure, and it won't sell in droves now if Phil Spencer goes all exclusive.
It’s a bit of a double edge sword on this one. You can’t respond to rumors, otherwise people will just write whatever they want and say, well MS didn’t deny it, so it must be true. They are in an unfortunate position to be able to properly respond to this.
The incentive won't be strong enough when it will have a smaller library of games compared to PS5 (Pro?)
Nintendo has shut off a lot of rumours which were shown to be inaccurate many times, it would be easy for MS to do the same.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/assets/2787141/nintendo.jpg)
www.theverge.com
frontofficesports.com
metro.co.uk
