I guess we should all be good little boys and girls and have beliefs exactly like yours, wouldnt tha be a fun world. 
later,
later,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sabastian said:Natoma said:epicstruggle said:I hope your joking. Because it seems that your a hypocrate for not letting them fight for their beliefs if they go against yours.Natoma said:The religious right just gets off on hating. You're right. Can't change that.
later,
I'm intolerant of intolerance epicstruggle. That may sound like a double standard, but I assure you it is not.
Well I am intolerant of your intolerance of free speech. You don't have to be a Christian to dislike a certain political agenda.
epicstruggle said:I guess we should all be good little boys and girls and have beliefs exactly like yours, wouldnt tha be a fun world.
later,
epicstruggle said:hmm, i dont see how im destroying you or your partner. I have issues with allowing same sex couples getting married. Getting married is not a fundamental right. Thats why I think you and the gay/lesbian community should be fighting for civil unions.
Listen there are intolerant people in this world. The world isnt fair, I dont know who told you it was, but they were lying. Maybe you feel that youve been targetted, but come on everyone has at some point or other been targetted. Im not sure but to me it seems that you you have issues with people who dont do what you want. I try to roll with the punches, sometimes life deals you a bad hand. Wait for the next deal.
later,
Natoma said:Because my relationship is not illegal in this country, I should be able to participate fully in marriage.
Religion and Religious beliefs do not legislation in this country make. We have a little revolutionary thing called Separation of Church and State.
Sabastian said:Natoma said:Because my relationship is not illegal in this country, I should be able to participate fully in marriage.
Religion and Religious beliefs do not legislation in this country make. We have a little revolutionary thing called Separation of Church and State.
You want Christians to change their moral convictions because your relationship is not illegal, that is what I thought.
epicstruggle said:for gods sake. Maybe you should start a petition removing the rights confered to married couples. Fight for that instead.
later,
Natoma said:p.s.: No, I don't care what your moral convictions are wrt the laws of this nation. You can have whatever moral convictions you like. But Marriage is a federally regulated construct because federal rights and privileges are conferred upon the married. Baptism is a religious construct because the government has nothing to do with it.
Because it is a federally regulated construct, and my relationship is not illegal in this country, I should be able to enter into marriage with my partner and receive the benefits and privileges associated with that federally regulated construct.
Sabastian said:Natoma said:p.s.: No, I don't care what your moral convictions are wrt the laws of this nation. You can have whatever moral convictions you like. But Marriage is a federally regulated construct because federal rights and privileges are conferred upon the married. Baptism is a religious construct because the government has nothing to do with it.
Because it is a federally regulated construct, and my relationship is not illegal in this country, I should be able to enter into marriage with my partner and receive the benefits and privileges associated with that federally regulated construct.
These things would be covered by a civil union but that is not good enough is it? You want to have Christians recognize your civil union as a marriage.
Sabastian said:Like I said in my edit. Anyhow if these cultures are not careful they will have their moral convictions robbed of them the same way Christians have. Ironically the move to multiculturalism is a move to uni-culturalism.
Natoma said:Not at all. Christians can continue to teach whatever it is they wish at home. Christians can continue to teach that gay sex is 'icky' and 'nasty' and against the law (god's law of course). But as long as the government of the United States doesn't agree, I'm fine and dandy.
Sabastian said:Natoma said:Not at all. Christians can continue to teach whatever it is they wish at home. Christians can continue to teach that gay sex is 'icky' and 'nasty' and against the law (god's law of course). But as long as the government of the United States doesn't agree, I'm fine and dandy.
They ought to be able to do that in their church as well. Along with all the other religions/cultures as well. Marriage is a religious cultural institution that is exclusively arranged for man and woman with the presupposition of a procreational natural family unit by the whole of humanity.
epicstruggle said:natoma you keep making inaccurate claims.
Christianity isnt what caused discrimination in South Africa, it was evil men and women who wanted power for whites, and not blacks. Before you claim all whites in SA are racists, i should tell you that many whites were against apartheid, but did not have the support/number to change the system.
Second, christians arent the only people against having same sex marriages. Basically every religion, + most republicans. I would estimate that about 45-60% of people in america are against same sex marriages, with about 5-10% who really dont care one way or another. And the rest for it.
Ill eat a shoe shapped cake if same sex marriages ever get created and pass muster with the supreme court.
later,
epicstruggle said:maybe what should happen is that govermnent should just get out of the marriage business. Let people get married to whoever/whatever they want to get married to, and to as many he/she/its as they want. Let the things like inheritance, health/social/economical benefits be things you state who you want to share with on a form.
later,