Why not the new Nvidia GPU's that they have to code for? Seems more plausible to me that the PS4/Xbox versions would have been completed some time ago since those platforms haven't changed in years. They said everything needed to run smoothly however the CP2077 benchmark with the 3090 was underwhelming for me. Then there's the new Navi 2 GPU's and the new consoles that are going to be released. Maybe they wanted to code better for that?Wonder what the issue is . low jaguar clocks on the base systems ? ps4 1.6ghz xbo 1.75ghz the pro and xbox one x has a 2.13 and 2.3ghz clock speed. I think if it was the gpu holding stuff back they would just down res the game on the xbox one and ps4 .
the game will run on those gpus fine. They could have simply delayed the rtx patch for the game instead of everything. I doubt the 30x0 and navi 2 gpus would have issues running the game. They are both more powerful than what is on the market today or at the very high end of what is at the market endWhy not the new Nvidia GPU's that they have to code for? Seems more plausible to me that the PS4/Xbox versions would have been completed some time ago since those platforms haven't changed in years. They said everything needed to run smoothly however the CP2077 benchmark with the 3090 was underwhelming for me. Then there's the new Navi 2 GPU's and the new consoles that are going to be released. Maybe they wanted to code better for that?
Maybe Sony let 3DPR know what their secret was to lower loading times?
What benchmark are you referring to?Why not the new Nvidia GPU's that they have to code for? Seems more plausible to me that the PS4/Xbox versions would have been completed some time ago since those platforms haven't changed in years. They said everything needed to run smoothly however the CP2077 benchmark with the 3090 was underwhelming for me. Then there's the new Navi 2 GPU's and the new consoles that are going to be released. Maybe they wanted to code better for that?
Maybe Sony let CDPR know what their secret was to lower loading times and they want to implement that?
Sorry, not CP2077 benchmark, it was Watch Dogs Legion Benchmark. Brain fart on my side.What benchmark are you referring to?
Sorry, not CP2077 benchmark, it was Watch Dogs Legion Benchmark. Brain fart on my side.
I can't think of any other game (from the top of my head at least) that was delayed after going gold!!!
Delaying a game that went gold is the epitome of Day 1 Patch culture. It's just sloppy. I understand how we got here, but damn it if it isn't sloppy. The industry should take a hard look on itself and rethink its practices. Day 1 patch should be an embarrassing exception, not the norm. Period.
How do you know it was broken? Maybe it was just suboptimal and quirky? Or had certain non-primary aspects disabled?
Delaying a game that went gold is the epitome of Day 1 Patch culture. It's just sloppy. I understand how we got here, but damn it if it isn't sloppy. The industry should take a hard look on itself and rethink its practices. Day 1 patch should be an embarrassing exception, not the norm. Period.
This isn't new. Ultima 9 was unplayable at launch for the majority of users
I have no clue why I'm not excited about this game yet. The graphics and animation is so gorgeous... yet the gameplay shown thus far, seems like "been there... done that" type of play. Maybe once I get into the story my perspective on the game will change.