anexanhume
Veteran
He's going to have to through the Process to be part of the 3% to own one on launch day.Surely this is some sort of joke trying to put @London Geezer through extreme stress?
That’s not the only reason chips yield poorly. It’s also likely 300 mm^2 or thereabouts. It’s not a 70nm chiplet like AMD is known for.High frequencies seemingly coming at a cost.
That’s not the only reason chips yield poorly. It’s also likely 300 mm^2 or thereabouts. It’s not a 70nm chiplet like AMD is known for.
powershift allows them to never have to announce a downclock. to the end user they wont notice if the ps5 hits max clock speed 10% of the time or 90% of the time (numbers out my ass). How would an end user even be able to check it.Strange news out before Wed event, are they preparing to announce a downclock at the event?
Strange news out before Wed event, are they preparing to announce a downclock at the event?
powershift allows them to never have to announce a downclock. to the end user they wont notice if the ps5 hits max clock speed 10% of the time or 90% of the time (numbers out my ass). How would an end user even be able to check it.
I see no correlation between the Bloomberg article and what you're suggesting (or is happening) at the upcoming PS5 event?
The event will have to tie down everything about the PS5, they can sneak in a lowered clock figures after prepping the news about yields problems?
The Bloomberg story doesn't even mention high-clocks being the source of the cause. So, I see no correlation of that being presented in a conference dealing with mostly games and possible pricing.
Clocks, size, design, thermal issues, process issues, non-optimal wafers (cost), contamination, packaging defects - and many more. It’s not just clocks.High clocks usually are part of the causes to lowered yields is that not the case?