If they didn't have legitimate issues then why did LG bother to improve the panel technology? :neutral:
Just for discussion purposes, if just 1% or even 0.1% of panels exhibited problems when used by consumers it would represent a significant cost to the company. As such, companies are always looking for a way to either improve reliability or decrease the cost of manufacture or both. Certain market segments will focus on one more than the other.
For where OLED is positioned, LG would rather improve reliability and quality than decrease those for cost savings. As such, even if only 0.001% of panels exhibited problems over the life of the product, they'd still likely look to improve the panel technology.
The vast majority of LG OLED TV owners are unlikely to frequent tech forums, especially if they aren't having a problem with their set. However, if they are having problems they are likely to look for solutions which may lead them to tech forums or social media sites. In other words, if everything is going fine, your average buyer isn't going to bother going to social media or a tech site. But if something goes wrong, they are then incentivized to talk about it.
This in no way implies that people don't have problems with the OLED panels, but it's also not limited to OLED panels. If you look at Amazon reviews, TCL has had some pretty bad panel problems in RTings recommended TCL HDTVs. Every product has problems, but not every products receives as much attention as OLED burn in, even if they might exhibit problems that are just as bad or worse.
Regards,
SB