I thought it was borked on PS3? I remember talk of tessellation happening on Cell.
Looks believable. They could sacrifice yield to 1up PS5.Based on what MS told us (particularly about their SSD, GDDR6, Navi), I think this has a good chance to be the real Anaconda and Lockhart specs.
https://pastebin.com/NUg1AqZm
Anaconda being Navi 10 with 56 CUs clocked at 1548Mhz (which is already quite a feat in a closed console with 8 Zen 2 cores clocked at 3.3 Ghz, they are allegedly and unsurpinsingly using a vapor chamber to cool the APU).
That hypothetical machine should be very powerful considering the Radeon 5700XT at 9.5 Tflops directly competes with Nvidia 2070. Maybe this could perform between Nvidia 2070 and 2080, higher than 1080.
Here Lockhart would be simply an underclocked Radeon 5700XT with 4 CUs deactivated (36 in total, so they could use the cheaper binned 5700XT chips) and 9 GDDR6 chips instead of 12 (this pastebin was before we had confirmation about a 40CUs Navi, before we had only rumors). Everything fits with what we know so far.
Based on what MS told us (particularly about their SSD, GDDR6, Navi), I think this has a good chance to be the real Anaconda and Lockhart specs.
https://pastebin.com/NUg1AqZm
Anaconda being Navi 10 with 56 CUs clocked at 1548Mhz (which is already quite a feat in a closed console with 8 Zen 2 cores clocked at 3.3 Ghz, they are allegedly and unsurpinsingly using a vapor chamber to cool the APU).
That hypothetical machine should be very powerful considering the Radeon 5700XT at 9.5 Tflops directly competes with Nvidia 2070. Maybe this could perform between Nvidia 2070 and 2080, higher than 1080.
Here Lockhart would be simply an underclocked Radeon 5700XT with 4 CUs deactivated (36 in total, so they could use the cheaper binned 5700XT chips) and 9 GDDR6 chips instead of 12 (this pastebin was before we had confirmation about a 40CUs Navi, before we had only rumors). Everything fits with what we know so far.
Based on what MS told us (particularly about their SSD, GDDR6, Navi), I think this has a good chance to be the real Anaconda and Lockhart specs.
https://pastebin.com/NUg1AqZm
Anaconda being Navi 10 with 56 CUs clocked at 1548Mhz (which is already quite a feat in a closed console with 8 Zen 2 cores clocked at 3.3 Ghz, they are allegedly and unsurpinsingly using a vapor chamber to cool the APU).
That hypothetical machine should be very powerful considering the Radeon 5700XT at 9.5 Tflops directly competes with Nvidia 2070. Maybe this could perform between Nvidia 2070 and 2080, higher than 1080.
Here Lockhart would be simply an underclocked Radeon 5700XT with 4 CUs deactivated (36 in total, so they could use the cheaper binned 5700XT chips) and 9 GDDR6 chips instead of 12 (this pastebin was before we had confirmation about a 40CUs Navi, before we had only rumors). Everything fits with what we know so far.
Based on what MS told us (particularly about their SSD, GDDR6, Navi), I think this has a good chance to be the real Anaconda and Lockhart specs.
https://pastebin.com/NUg1AqZm
Anaconda being Navi 10 with 56 CUs clocked at 1548Mhz (which is already quite a feat in a closed console with 8 Zen 2 cores clocked at 3.3 Ghz, they are allegedly and unsurpinsingly using a vapor chamber to cool the APU).
That hypothetical machine should be very powerful considering the Radeon 5700XT at 9.5 Tflops directly competes with Nvidia 2070. Maybe this could perform between Nvidia 2070 and 2080, higher than 1080.
Here Lockhart would be simply an underclocked Radeon 5700XT with 4 CUs deactivated (36 in total, so they could use the cheaper binned 5700XT chips) and 9 GDDR6 chips instead of 12 (this pastebin was before we had confirmation about a 40CUs Navi, before we had only rumors). Everything fits with what we know so far.
And why do you Guys think that NextGen Consoles have only 8-10Tflops??
Actually this is far from true.There is really no proof of two Xbox models , Microsoft has already stated on the E3 Conference that they bring only one Scarlett Model next Year to the Market
he fixed it.
4x lockhart, 2x anaconda
~6/~12 TF respectively.
If Ps5 uses HBM it will also have interposer, which opens interesting opportunities for multi chip designs.The rumor above seems consistent with the other two rumors: PS5 uses HBM2 (from reddit) and PS5 is more powerful (from employee of Game Informer ).
GDDR6 consumes too much power so PS5 chooses HBM2 and they can clock the GPU higher, therefore being more powerful.
If the rumor is true then the storage is key differentiator. MS only wants to speed up the loading time, while SONY design a super fast unified SSD pool and every PS5 exclusive games can have more advanced design, especially SONY's games.
I agree, but in the recent interview they dodged the questions about having more than one console and stubbornly answered twice: 'Scarlett is our console plan' :There is really no proof of two Xbox models , Microsoft has already stated on the E3 Conference that they bring only one Scarlett Model next Year to the Market, for the cheaper low end Gaming Market they have already Xbox one X or S. They can bring a new 7 nm Refresh of them , so no need for a dowgraded Scarlett Model. And why do you Guys think that NextGen Consoles have only 8-10Tflops?? There are many Signals out there that they have 11-14 Tflops. MS and Sony focusing a higher Tflop Amount than Goggle Stadia(10 TFlops). And Raytracing need alot additional Floatingpoint Power and Cachememory. Also the Discussion about deactivated Cu's is complete ridiculus. It start with the "they must activated 2 Cu's " meme and now we are at 8 , some People say 40 CU 's is already enough because the Yieldrate is so much better than with 64 CU's , and a Navi CU is much more efficient than Vega or Polaris CU' s. Is that really enough? Hanging around these efficient meme Argument ? And if that so its Microsofts own fault , if they use a discrete GPU they have much better Yieldrate and a higher CU Number. In this Point why here are some people To promote permantently "APUs are the best solution" when it is in reality not, because of the
many compromises you have with it , like limited DIE Size, Clockspeed, CU Number, Yieldrate etc...?? Only focusing on a low Price is not the best answer for me as a Customer , and the Production of APUs is not so cheap like many people think. So where are the benefits of APUs beside the Question how many Dollars cost a Gaming console(399-599$)?
EG: But last year Phil Spencer talked about new Xbox consoles, plural. What should we expect next year?
Matt Booty: ...Scarlett is our console plan...
EG: You did say console not consoles plan there.
Matt Booty: Scarlett is our console plan...
It's a single console. You can't have Scarlett described as being 4x XB1X if it's two different consoles with two different specs. Most likely scenario is a smaller streaming box is planned, but after Scarlett's release so the message doesn't get confused and early-adopters know exactly what box they're buying.There's a single project Scarlett console range...
There is a reason MS didn’t share numbers.
Because this shit isn’t locked yet, both parties are trying to outmaneuver each other, and anyone who tells you they know the answer to this question is lying to you, period.
If Ps5 uses HBM it will also have interposer, which opens interesting opportunities for multi chip designs.
Kind of doubtful to see HBM on console, although it certainly would make motherboard lovely looking.
I wouldn't rule this out.It's a single console. You can't have Scarlett described as being 4x XB1X if it's two different consoles with two different specs. Most likely scenario is a smaller streaming box is planned, but after Scarlett's release so the message doesn't get confused and early-adopters know exactly what box they're buying.
That was the wavelength I got when MS pulled a complete Me - Too moment with only really discussing SSD.Somebody named "Matt" who is a moderator and apparently "somebody" made some interesting posts on Reset Era.
About Scarlett/PS5 debate https://www.resetera.com/threads/an...-project-scarlett.122011/page-5#post-21635606
And
https://www.resetera.com/threads/ne...-ot5-its-in-rdna.120059/page-92#post-21638104
Pretty much what I would expect.
Although I wasn't sure Sony was even interested in being most powerful. Probably Cerny is the one being smart and pushing them
Because the 9.75 TF GPU that both consoles are based on is looking like it requires ~200W and not too mention the CPU that has around a 65W TPD as well. Both Sony and MS will need to shave off around a ~100W and it won't be by adding more Teraflops.
Now, I believe both consoles are going to be able to achieve much better power efficiency then their PC counterparts as they will be optimized for a single product and frequency target, but the gains won't be magical. Maybe we'll get a surprise and they deliver 200+ W boxes sold at a $100 loss, but I'm not making that bet.