AMD: Speculation, Rumors, and Discussion (Archive)

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by iMacmatician, Mar 30, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. xEx

    xEx Veteran

    Maybe is all what they can do without physically modify the card.
     
  2. xEx

    xEx Veteran

    On the MoBo side its "5.5A MAX"
     
  3. ninelven

    ninelven PM Veteran

    I'm sure if you think about it, you can figure it out.....

    Only for voltage, which is not the problem...
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  4. SimBy

    SimBy Regular

    You are correct. And they are exactly 4% above that in worst case.
     
  5. flopper

    flopper Newcomer

    Basically means amd released a card that is out of spec then.
    90% engineers hired so how does one defend such big as mistake?
     
  6. ninelven

    ninelven PM Veteran

    Umm... 6.2/5.5 = 1.127.. or 12.7%
     
    Grall and A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y like this.
  7. SimBy

    SimBy Regular

    I should have been more clear, I was talking about compatibility mode ON.
     
  8. CSI PC

    CSI PC Veteran

    Overall I think the solution works.
    But, why did they not also test with power target and/or OC?
    It is as if they think no-one is going to play around with WattMan.
    I am kinda surprised, and this is not about trying to catch out AMD, just to define what can be done with the reference card from a consumer perspective.

    Cheers
     
    Razor1 and pharma like this.
  9. xEx

    xEx Veteran

    Probably not enough resources.
     
  10. ninelven

    ninelven PM Veteran

    Spec compliance wise it is exactly the same as before the "fix". I mean why bother releasing a "fix" if it doesn't actually change the situation....
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  11. SimBy

    SimBy Regular

    Do only way this is 100% fixable is a recall and 8 pin. Simple as that.
     
  12. ninelven

    ninelven PM Veteran

    Not really.... as long as they are within spec on the motherboard side they would only be liable for card/psu issues, which there shouldn't be any.
     
  13. Razor1

    Razor1 Veteran

    Only way is to drop frequency/voltage to get into the pci-e spec of the amps of the motherboard and everything else. They just don't want to drop its performance.....
     
    xpea, spworley, CSI PC and 1 other person like this.
  14. SimBy

    SimBy Regular

    Well obviously :lol: I expect reference design to kinda go EOL rather quickly.
     
  15. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■) Moderator Legend Alpha

    To be slightly less cancerous? or toxic? "Now with 8.7% less Amps!"
     
    Kej, CSI PC, Razor1 and 1 other person like this.
  16. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member Legend

    It brought the PCIe slot portion to more or less within spec (some variance between different "quality" GPUs etc), and no-one really gives a crap about the PCIe power connectors, you can pull something.. was it near 200W from 6 pin without dangering the integrity of even lowest quality PCIe power connectors, even though the spec says 75W max, and many cards have pulled "over the spec" from them before, too.
     
  17. Razor1

    Razor1 Veteran

    the amps are still way over the pci-e spec. ~13% over
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  18. ninelven

    ninelven PM Veteran

    There is no "more or less". The current is either <= 5.5 Amps or it is not.

    It is baffling really.... but what isn't these days.
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  19. Razor1

    Razor1 Veteran

    and the excessive amperage draw was causing the vdroop if I'm not mistake.
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  20. Entropy

    Entropy Veteran

    May I suggest that the power draw alarmists are shunted off to their own thread?
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...