AMD Radeon RDNA2 Navi (RX 6500, 6600, 6700, 6800, 6900 XT)

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by BRiT, Oct 28, 2020.

  1. Just like every other AMD and Nvidia graphics card that released within the last year or so.



    What discrete GPU launched in 2020 or 2021 fell in price below launch MSRP?
    Are you sure you're in the right decade?
     
  2. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    What did you pay for your 6900 XT?
     
  3. MSRP (1000€), in a weekly lottery "event" arranged by AMD to sell a couple dozen reference GPUs at that "insanely low" price.
    I.e. I bought it in a time-/quantity-limited arrangement just like @Jawed suggested.

    Aside from the ones being sold by AMD.com, all 6900 XTs are selling way above 1000€.

    6900XT in Germany:
    https://geizhals.eu/?fs=6900 XT&sort=p&hloc=at&hloc=de&hloc=eu&hloc=pl&hloc=uk&cat=gra16_512

    6900XT in the US:
    https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=6900XT&Order=1
     
    CarstenS likes this.
  4. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    2,132
    Location:
    London
    April 2017 launch MSRP for RX 570 was $169 according to Tech Power Up:

    AMD Radeon RX 570 Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database

    (there were 4GB variants of the normally-8GB RX 580, so that's why I've picked RX 570).

    It was a victim of the 2017 Crypto Craze:

    Video Cards - Price Trends - PCPartPicker (archive.org)

    and in 2019 was finally selling with some SKUs below that price:

    Video Cards - Price Trends - PCPartPicker (archive.org)

    as seen from the long, high-saturation, blue lines, many of which are at or below $150. Amusing to see that the average price hit $450 in February 2018, and of course it's hit that kind of price again, this year...

    RX 580's launch MSRP was $229 and it would seem reasonable to expect 6600XT to be about $250 just based upon die-size and memory amount, four years later. But 7nm costs more than 14nm, 16Gbps GDDR6 memory costs more than 8Gbps GDDR5. And crypto.
     
    Cyan likes this.
  5. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    2,132
    Location:
    London
  6. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    Today, with 4 more days on shelf, the number has climbed to 2820 (missing the MSI Gaming X, so add at least 170 if you will, and sporting an Asrock design with 710 units sold)
     
    Lightman, BRiT and Tarkin1977 like this.
  7. upload_2021-8-19_23-37-56.png


    Playing one DX11 game at average 24W GPU ASIC Power and 77W CPU Package Power (R9 5950X). The RX6600XT is very efficient holy crap.
    Granted game is not very demanding, and with my RX5700XT I usually consume ~140W for same performance on this game compared to 25W on 6600XT.

    I removed my 5700XT because I wanted something small and runs cool, turns out the 6600XT exceeded my expectations
     
    Wesker, Kej, Pete and 12 others like this.
  8. Wesker

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Oxford, UK
    Radeon Pro W6800X Duo review:


    Some pretty disappointing results, IMO.
     
  9. [​IMG]



    EDIT: Took a little look at that review, and they don't compare it to anything, just "it's barely faster than my previous Vega Duo". Sounds a bit useless IMO.

    I wonder if the drivers and apps are properly detecting the two GPUs. The only thing that seems to be scaling properly is Geekbench.
     
    #3229 Deleted member 13524, Aug 25, 2021
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 25, 2021
    Lightman and digitalwanderer like this.
  10. Wesker

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Oxford, UK
    There seems to be a lot of thermal problems too, which is quite bizarre. Could be a bad sample?
     
    digitalwanderer likes this.
  11. digitalwanderer

    digitalwanderer Dangerously Mirthful
    Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,987
    Likes Received:
    3,529
    Location:
    Winfield, IN USA
    Could just be two 6800s glued together with inadequate cooling. Seems like a lot of heat in a tiny place. :|
     
  12. Inadequate cooling? Did you see the size of that thing?
    That is no moon!
     
    Wesker, BRiT, Rootax and 4 others like this.
  13. Pressure

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    593
    This definitely seems like a bad sample, especially if it idles over 100 ºC.

    That would obviously skew all the benchmarks.
     
    Wesker likes this.
  14. Diamond.G

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    VA
    IIIRC that card is passively cooled and Apple is big on not ramping fans until the last possible moment…
     
  15. Tofu

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    9
  16. no-X

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    471
    According to some leakers the 6nm Navi 2x refresh should be released with RDNA 3 products, according to other ones it will be released later (2022?). One way or another, 6nm products should not be ready earlier than at the end of 2022.
     
  17. Does N6 effectively offer any clock advantage over N7P @ iso-power?
     
  18. Bondrewd

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,682
    Likes Received:
    846
    2% or something silly like that.
    oops
     
  19. Pressure

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    593
    Here is some proper benchmarks for the Pro W6800X Duo.

    Also transcoding 20 minute RED 6K (Komodo) footage to 422 HQ in Final Cut Pro only takes 8.42 compared to 11.01 for the Pro Vega II Duo.
     
  20. vjPiedPiper

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    88
    Location:
    Melbourne Aus.
    help me out with what might be a dumb Q.

    As I understand it, Nv RTX cards need to build BVH structures in trees with 2 nodes/leaves, whereas the AMD RT cards can support BVH structures with both 2 and 4 nodes/leaves.

    Is this transparent to games? ( i think not..?)
    Are there any games that support building BVH structures for RT using the 4 leaves per node, or any benchamrks?

    Basically is there any app or game that would allow for a like for like ( or close to that ) comparison of the perf impact of each approach?
    The BVH building actually happens on the CPU or GPU? or is it workload/engine variable?

    Sorry if these are dumb Q.s
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...