AMD: Navi Speculation, Rumours and Discussion [2019-2020]
- Thread starter Kaotik
- Start date
- Status
yes. my bank account after the upgrade i guess...
150% less of a measure, no, but technically you can compare the difference of a percentage change...
"Growth was 350% in the first month and 200% in the second - growth was 150% less in the second month."
But, those would be dumb, confusing numbers.
In this context, 150% is likely a mistake.
150% less of a measure, no, but technically you can compare the difference of a percentage change...
"Growth was 350% in the first month and 200% in the second - growth was 150% less in the second month."
But, those would be dumb, confusing numbers.
In this context, 150% is likely a mistake.
Albeit that kind of sentence does happen in common parlance, it's also considered less than ideal. When comparing percentages like that, one should use the term "percentage points"
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Or basis points ...
150% less of a measure, no, but technically you can compare the difference of a percentage change...
"Growth was 350% in the first month and 200% in the second - growth was 150% less in the second month."
But, those would be dumb, confusing numbers.
In this context, 150% is likely a mistake.
Yes, I was in a hurry and mistakenly put 150%, instead of 50%... (so mock me)
Vega20 is GCN, and rdna1 is 50% greater performance per watt. While rdna2 is another 50% improvement. Though I suspect many of you know what I was hinting at, but choose to chide me, instead of engage in a discussion.
There is no mistaken the gains AMD has made. Only thing left, is to see rdna2..
DegustatoR
Legend
* When compared to Vega 10, not 20. And Vega itself is hardly a great example of GCN in power efficiency. So maybe you should look at the available data instead of blindly listening to what Lisa Su says from stage to investors.
Again, you point is extremely weak, because you can see there are clear gains... that you are 100% dismissing.
ed: When have you know dr su to lie..?
The other measure is, RDNA2 provides 225% performance improvement over GCN.
There is no mistaken the gains AMD has made. Only thing left, is to see rdna2..
That's Vega 10 and to be more specific that's Vega 64 compared to 5700 XT and unknown RDNA 2 modelYes, I was in a hurry and mistakenly put 150%, instead of 50%... (so mock me)
Vega20 is GCN, and rdna1 is 50% greater performance per watt. While rdna2 is another 50% improvement. Though I suspect many of you know what I was hinting at, but choose to chide me, instead of engage in a discussion.
There is no mistaken the gains AMD has made. Only thing left, is to see rdna2..
Correct and that is a good place to start, for speculation and non-rumor. We already know where the 5700xt stands...
So, getting back to my earlier statement:
Navi10 is pretty small die (251mm^2) and if you make a chip the size of vega20 (331mm^2), using rdna2 architecture you have essentially a 2080ti's performance, using about 50% less power than Radeon Vii.
FTFY.
Sure like to see that happening.
Hey, there's no rule that says you can't put a diesel generator on a graphics card.
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
It's relevant on what performance would be expected within a console's (usually) more constrained TDP.
Is it following Navi 10 performance/power curves, or Navi 10 * 1.5?
Frenetic Pony
Veteran
Both the official Xsx design and the apparent PS5 devkit design seem centered around a lot of airflow, so I'm guessing both realized they can get much more out of the chips they buy if they have a good cooling system. My guess is both will have a decently higher TDP than the PS4/XBO this time around.
From the leaked pictures, Xsx uses a 2pin AC connector that can't go over 200W...
pics here:
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/70109/xbox-series-prototype-shown-again-latest-renders/index.html
Edit: After checking these plugs are 10A rated so no real power limit on the APU, except the size/noise/cost of the cooling solution
Last edited:
You sure about that? I have a figure 8 power cable with a tag on it right in front of me. It says 10amp.
after checking, you are right, these plugs are 10A rated. I don't know why I was thinking 3A... please forget my comment
- Status