You haven't seen anything remotely resembling actual Navi chips or their power targets.
I have seen NAVI board with 2 x 8-pin PCIe power connectors and I heard from Sapphire repr., that there is watter cooled NAVI board, which speaks itself .-)
You haven't seen anything remotely resembling actual Navi chips or their power targets.
What does the water cooling say to you?I have seen NAVI board with 2 x 8-pin PCIe power connectors and I heard from Sapphire repr., that there is watter cooled NAVI board, which speaks itself .-)
I've seen the TU102 board with 3*8pin.I have seen NAVI board with 2 x 8-pin PCIe power connectors
I'm pretty sure there's watercooled 1070s.I heard from Sapphire repr., that there is watter cooled NAVI board, which speaks itself .-)
And I have seen TU102 board with 3 x 8-pin PCIe power connectorsI have seen NAVI board with 2 x 8-pin PCIe power connectors
Last Toxic-series models I know of having watercooling were with 135 and 210 W TDPs, that doesn't actually speak anything for itself.and I heard from Sapphire repr., that there is watter cooled NAVI board, which speaks itself .-)
I've seen the TU102 board with 3*8pin.
You missed the point (I'm pretty sure @Bondrewd had same point as me) - TU102 ES was 3x8, that doesn't mean retail needs it. Just like Navi ES was 2x8 doesn't mean retail needs ityes, TU102 and NAVI are very comparable performance wise . LoL
You missed the point (I'm pretty sure @Bondrewd had same point as me) - TU102 ES was 3x8, that doesn't mean retail needs it. Just like Navi ES was 2x8 doesn't mean retail needs it
yes, TU102 and NAVI are very comparable performance wise . LoL
That's some exceptional goalpost moving, but that doesn't change TU102 ES being a 525W housefire.yes. Vega 10 clocked below 1200MHz can be efficient too ...
yes, it was very quickly deleted. So it may be some truth in it.... Who knows. Take it with ususal amount of salt. Strange thing about this info is why would they make such big change with last GCN and not with Fiji/Vega already.
It´s get quickly removed, while I wrote this post.... but I have back up https://uploads.disquscdn.com/image...f008d89a5810ca72ae0155f87a805.png?w=800&h=514
Probably just the particular SKU. It sounds like it'd be a 4x Kaio Ken Pitcairn.Wait... is he saying Navi will have maximum 5 CU per SE? Or is he talking about the specific case of the 40 CU navi announced for PC?
Probably just the particular SKU. It sounds like it'd be a 4x Kaio Ken Pitcairn.
Nope, they've had watercooled Toxic-cards before, X1900 XTX and HD 2900 XThttp://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=276
AFAIK it's the first time Sapphire will be offering a custom WC card. So far they've only launched graphics cards with reference waterblocks (Fury X and Vega 64 LC).
It could go either way, really.
Probably just the particular SKU. It sounds like it'd be a 4x Kaio Ken Pitcairn.
I'm not sure what to make of the 32 wavefront per CU compared to current GCN. Currently, we're at 10 wavefronts per SIMD (40 per CU) unless the terminology is garbled.
https://forum.beyond3d.com/threads/gcn-and-mixed-wavefronts.59610/
Nope, they've had watercooled Toxic-cards before, X1900 XTX and HD 2900 XT
Is it safe to deduce that the next generation will be akin to Pitcairn in Super-Saiyan mode?
So Polaris 10 moved to 3 CUs sharing the K$ & I$ for wiring purposes. Wonder if they're taking another step with just paired CUs while also moving to the (apparent) super-SIMD
- Each SIMD has capacity for 10 waves (64 lanes/wave)
- Each CU has a peak throughput of 64 VALU instructions/clock
- Each 4 CUs share 16KiB K$ (Constant L1), and 32KiB I$ (Instruction L1)
Wait... is he saying Navi will have maximum 5 CU per SE? Or is he talking about the specific case of the 40 CU navi announced for PC?
That's Navi.I believe, radical changes may come with new architecture....