AMD Hits Highest-Ever x86 CPU Market Share
No. It's had far higher over the decades, even outselling Intel some years, I believe.
AMD Hits Highest-Ever x86 CPU Market Share
Yes. I thought there were times AMD dominated the market. Back in the Athlon days when Pentium 4 was a disaster as one example.No. It's had far higher over the decades, even outselling Intel some years, I believe.
Yes. I thought there were times AMD dominated the market. Back in the Athlon days when Pentium 4 was a disaster as one example.
I hope the idle power & casual use battery life are somewhat competitive with my M2 Max 16” Macbook Pro, otherwise those specs are the exact opposite of a selling point for me… (I’d like to switch back to a PC laptop at some point, but there’s nothing remotely compelling at this point, so I hope these APUs actually deliver on their theoretical potential!)https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-com...ighlights-monster-120w-tdp-and-64gb-ram-limit
The extremely high 120W TDP (for a mobile chip) and 64GB of memory start to make sense when you consider the sky-high specs Strix Halo is rumored to be carrying. It's not uncommon for outgoing Intel mobile chips to consume as much as 75-100W in bursty workloads, so a 120W TDP for a 16-core chip and a monster iGPU combined is very likely.
For servers it's probably the highest ever. For diy desktops we don't have separate numbers but it's not a stretch (considering retailers like mindfactory as a data point) to say it's up there with the records, and outselling intel.No. It's had far higher over the decades, even outselling Intel some years, I believe.
AMD have never outsold Intel. The highest market share AMD have ever had on x86 market was ~25 % in 2006.No. It's had far higher over the decades, even outselling Intel some years, I believe.
I doubt anything is going to touch Apple M Macbooks for battery life. They seem so perfectly tuned for power sipping.I hope the idle power & casual use battery life are somewhat competitive with my M2 Max 16” Macbook Pro, otherwise those specs are the exact opposite of a selling point for me… (I’d like to switch back to a PC laptop at some point, but there’s nothing remotely compelling at this point, so I hope these APUs actually deliver on their theoretical potential!)
The company claims that Snapdragon-based laptops will deliver 16.8 to 29.9 hours, depending on the screen type. To be precise, the FHD+ option at 29.6 hrs, QHD at 21.9 hrs, and OLED at 16.8 hrs. That’s respectively a 91%, 98%, and 68% improvement in battery life compared to the Intel Alder Lake-P chip.
Performance might be adequate outside of applications not requiring AVX/2 support ...There are of course a ton of question marks around how well this Snapdragon launch will go, emulation performance key among them. But Intel/AMD are going to be facing some serious competition if these are at all competent.
I’m not sure I find this credible, what else would XFX do? They literally only make AMD GPUs, this wouldn’t even be an EVGA scenario where could theoretically focus on PSUs or something.A friend of mine (an established reviewer with solid connections to AIBs) is claiming that -after MSI- XFX will no longer produce new AMD GPUs, they will just do demo cards for the upcoming RX 8000 series and that's it.
He claims the reason is the razor thin margins on these GPUs, even Sapphire is suffering, as AMD insists on selling the GPUs to AIBs at a certain fixed price while at the same time keeps slashing retail prices, which leaves AIBs with almost nothing.
Take this info with a huge grain of salt of course, only time will tell if it's true or not.
They do sell quite a few PSUs too, and you've gotta figure their margins are likely better on them as well.I’m not sure I find this credible, what else would XFX do? They literally only make AMD GPUs, this wouldn’t even be an EVGA scenario where could theoretically focus on PSUs or something.
ARM V9 SoC with SVE2 is coming from QC with Oryon V2 core and from future Mediatek / NVDA products (targeting console and Windows)Performance might be adequate outside of applications not requiring AVX/2 support ...
AMD/Intel CPUs are still going to be the only options for high-end gaming since many ARM vendors refuse to implement 256-bit SVE/2 support which could be used to emulate AVX/2 efficiently for games like Starfield and a few recent Sony PC ports ...
Is that 128-bit or 256-bit SVE/2 implementation ? The former is not good enough to attempt AVX/2 emulation but the number one performance killer so far is doing TSO emulation so it'd be helpful if implementations supported LRCPC/2/3 features just like Apple's CPUs for their Rosetta 2 translator ...ARM V9 SoC with SVE2 is coming from QC with Oryon V2 core and from future Mediatek / NVDA products (targeting console and Windows)
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/micr..._rdKM-DNxgoUmcR9iadvJdo2rjOLkCDp8gJjmbXt3YbHI
The tech giant’s Azure cloud service will integrate AMD’s MI300X AI chips, offering an alternative to Nvidia’s high-demand H100 GPUs.