Spidermate
Regular
BlueTsunami said:Off Topic: You gonna get torn up by PC-Engine *Abort* *Abort*!
lol ok
BlueTsunami said:Off Topic: You gonna get torn up by PC-Engine *Abort* *Abort*!
Spidermate said:One supports dual screens at the highest level while the other can barely support one.
jvd said:Bs .
We don't even know if the ps3 can support one screen at the level xbox 360 can . As a matter of fact i have yet to see one actual game running on the system in which someone was playing the game .
All we've seen are cgi and tech demos . If you want to make a bs comment you should prepare yourself for more than just pc-engine .
Spidermate said:Whatever you want to believe, that's fine by me. I answered a question. You interpret it how you want, slick.
AlphaWolf said:Perhaps it would help if you had some proof for your supposition.
Spidermate said:I guess it would help for any proof right about now, but as you can see, things are a little scarce and taboo at the moment. I guess that's something we are going to have to deal with until the proper time comes. Wouldn't you agree?
AlphaWolf said:Which makes answers like the one you gave a bit ridiculous. Wouldn't you agree?
Spidermate said:I guess it would help for any proof right about now, but as you can see, things are a little scarce and taboo at the moment. I guess that's something we are going to have to deal with until the proper time comes. Wouldn't you agree?
Spidermate said:One supports dual screens at the highest level while the other can barely support one.
They're talking about Spring 2006 release - the specs they published are equivalent to the specs we published when you go away from theoretical performance. It's a jump ball. Two companies selling something at Wal-Mart for the same amount of money and coming four months apart. They aren't going to have products that are materially different. Plus they're willing to dump a whole lot of money per unit, and I'll tell you what: As a company with more money than just about anyone, Microsoft isn't willing to do that again because it was really tough for us the first time around. So I'd be surprised if they had a strategy that said they could lose a few billion this gen to make more powerful hardware.
Thegameman said:What make J Allard think that if the majority of the gaming comunity din't suport the xbox...
... when it was the most powerful hardware with HDD build in,they will suport it now that the the hardware advanatge is gone and HDD is not standar,even him is saying that the consoles are on par,which could literaly mean sony has the best tech and we will not admit it.
Joe DeFuria said:The majority of the gaming community didn't support X-Box. They supported PS2.
MX had zero console presence when XBOX launched. (Much different than today). Coming out later than PS2, MS had to give early adopters a reason to buy it. MS had exactly two things going for them:
1) Better hardware
2) Halo
Which brings us to the main reason why anyone would think that people would support xbox 360 (or any other console)...games.
Joe DeFuria said:The majority of the gaming community didn't support X-Box. They supported PS2.
MX had zero console presence when XBOX launched. (Much different than today). Coming out later than PS2, MS had to give early adopters a reason to buy it. MS had exactly two things going for them:
Thegameman said:Oh Sony din't either in 1994 and they whent to sell 100 million PS,that is not and escuse for failure.
halo might have been the killer app, but the xbox at launch had a number of other exclusives, and games that were ported to it had extra content. in fact, i can't remember a single port in the launch window that didn't have a little something extra for xbox owners, even if the game was launched on multiple systems at the same time. spider-man, for example, had extra levels and an extrs boss (kraven), dave mirra 2 had a couple of extra levels ect. nothing really huge, but it showed microsoft was working with developers and publishers to give the consumer a little more.Joe DeFuria said:MX had zero console presence when XBOX launched. (Much different than today). Coming out later than PS2, MS had to give early adopters a reason to buy it. MS had exactly two things going for them:
1) Better hardware
2) Halo
Which brings us to the main reason why anyone would think that people would support xbox 360 (or any other console)...games.
jvd said:Perhaps you should refrain from making statements then if you have no clue what your talking about .
Blatently bashing one system and praising another with no proof is not the proper way to act.
Esp then poking fun of another site member with the help of another poster .
Horrible behavior
You're the one stating something, you need to back it up. That's how it works. Putting the onus on someone else to prove your statement wrong is not how it works.Spidermate said:You want proof that something does exist but I was never shown any that something doesn't exist.
This is so silly. Are people on this board really shocked that an MS employee would own a PS2?drpepper said:LOL, and Ballmer has an iPod hand delivered by Steve Jobs.
Well, probably not...
Do MS employees ever use their own products?
Spidermate said:In the meantime and with all due respect, I would rather you not tell me how valid one statement is over the other because I didn't answer the question in the way you would have liked.
Good day.