Doomtrooper
Veteran
We talked about this earlier Ostsol, higher precision must be there for a reason (maybe for professional rendering) but it does look like one card will be 96-bit vs 64-bit if Carmack is correct.
Ostsol said:Doomtrooper said:From B3D's Nv30 vs 9700 Comparison:
The CineFX architecture also allows for an alternative lower precision FP16 format, which allows for 16-bits per component, thus giving a lower overall overhead in performance. This lower precision 64-bit format is compliant with the minimum level of DirectX9 compatibility
That makes even more sense when you consider the precision hint available in PS2.0 that allows for instructions to use a lesser precision if directed to do so.
worm[Futuremark said:]*dumdedumdedum*
Well conspiracy he said?....RussSchultz said:I guess that means we'll see GF-FX in the stores in on Monday.
http://news.zdnet.de/story/0,,t101-s2130068,00.htmlHersteller will laut einigen Händlern zwei Versionen anbieten; Winfast A300-Platinen sollen ab 10. Februar ab 530 Euro verfügbar sein
I'd say there will be at least one DX7, one DX8, and one DX9 game test, given that the min spec is a DX7 level card.
"With a fully DX7 compliant card, you can only run 1 game test"
Yup!Kristof said:Make sure to check the credits...
*dumdedumdidum*
Good one! I think Dave is looking at you all like this now:Tahir said:Me sorry for not posting 50 threads in B3D stating 3DMark03 is the greatest thing since sliced bread but I think John Reynolds and Dava Baumann may have minded.