Xbox Business Update Podcast | Xbox Everywhere Direction Discussion

[iroboto]

Xbox controller supply has been tight for months. Even from Amazon I had a several week shipping time.

Yea, assuming that once again, they were expecting a massive cloud push to happen in Nov and Dec, they likely had a bunch of Direct-to-Cloud controllers sitting around. This was leaked back earlier in the year and should have come out by now.

But with cloud being paused again, they probably have to make the decision to resume normal controllers or make cloud controllers the default.

We have tons of information and officially released information about their push for android and cloud. Thst was supposed to happen in Nov/Dec. we know those plans got stuffed by late Oct.

We have no official information about cancelling console strategies and what not. But everyone seems to be going that route.

Xbox is certainly not meeting internal targets, it’s clear they’ve been pivoting, but likely all of this because they’ve put a lot of momentum behind their cloud push, only to be stuffed. It makes it seem like Xbox has been sitting idle with no direction, but if you look closely they had
A) COD on game pass
B) Xbox store ready for android
C) Cloud components ready for players
D) cloud contorllers

All aligned and ready for November. Unfortunately that fell flat and oddly no leakers talk about that. That’s because leakers are all 3rd party folks, retailers etc. so the great pivot had to happen to make up for all completely failed launch. And now we see the effect of
A) lack of series x hardware
B) lack of controllers
C) exclusives all going multiplatform
D) push towards 3rd party mobile hardware
E) this is an Xbox campaign.

 

[Cappuccino]

It is, imo, a very real possibility they likely diverted a great deal of many chips for cloud in the lead up to the android store opening up, which unfortunately didn’t.

They have a bunch of cloud hardware and campaigns that are sitting dormant, and without them knowing when the Ninth Circuit will wrap up, they have to give up their cloud plans again and focus back on traditional strategies.

So they deliberately prioritized chips for cloud over their console line? Don't you see how this doesn't exactly bode well for Xbox hardware?

It is very clear where MS' priorities lie and tbh I don't really get it, who is seriously gaming 'on the cloud'? I get that I/we aren't exactly the average consumer in this segment but of all the people I speak to I'm the only one that's used something like GeForce Now or Xbox Cloud Gaming.

Some of the most popular games in existence RN are all twitchy shooters and are basically unplayable on the cloud so I really don't get it lol.

 

[Cappuccino]

I looked for a new Elite2 Core controller and they don't even offer a black version at the moment. Really smart product strategy.

I don't think they ever offered a black Core controller since the mainline one is black. Why not just buy that?

 

[QPlayer]

Yea, assuming that once again, they were expecting a massive cloud push to happen in Nov and Dec, they likely had a bunch of Direct-to-Cloud controllers sitting around. This was leaked back earlier in the year and should have come out by now.

But with cloud being paused again, they probably have to make the decision to resume normal controllers or make cloud controllers the default.

We have tons of information and officially released information about their push for android and cloud. Thst was supposed to happen in Nov/Dec. we know those plans got stuffed by late Oct.

We have no official information about cancelling console strategies and what not. But everyone seems to be going that route.

Xbox is certainly not meeting internal targets, it’s clear they’ve been pivoting, but likely all of this because they’ve put a lot of momentum behind their cloud push, only to be stuffed. It makes it seem like Xbox has been sitting idle with no direction, but if you look closely they had
A) COD on game pass
B) Xbox store ready for android
C) Cloud components ready for players
D) cloud contorllers

All aligned and ready for November. Unfortunately that fell flat and oddly no leakers talk about that. That’s because leakers are all 3rd party folks, retailers etc. so the great pivot had to happen to make up for all completely failed launch. And now we see the effect of
A) lack of series x hardware
B) lack of controllers
C) exclusives all going multiplatform
D) push towards 3rd party mobile hardware
E) this is an Xbox campaign.

This is stupid, the cloud-based game will always remain a secondary line, you just can't build on it. And the main reason for this is lag, LAG. The most successful service-based and multiplayer games are unusable in online streaming services, even single-player games do not offer the same experience as with a dedicated hardware, namely because of the resolution. The global internet infrastructure is not yet ready to play properly in 4K image quality at a stable 60 FPS. There are countries where 1 Gbit internet speed is common, but in most places only 50-100 Mbit is available.

They still have to make consoles or console PCs that do the math and display the graphics locally.

 

[Nisaaru]

I don't think they ever offered a black Core controller since the mainline one is black. Why not just buy that?

The full one costs 40 bucks more as the Core Edition. This would be now my 3rd Elite2 after 2Elite1 and 3 normal ones since 2013

 

[rntongo]

This is stupid, the cloud-based game will always remain a secondary line, you just can't build on it. And the main reason for this is lag, LAG. The most successful service-based and multiplayer games are unusable in online streaming services, even single-player games do not offer the same experience as with a dedicated hardware, namely because of the resolution. The global internet infrastructure is not yet ready to play properly in 4K image quality at a stable 60 FPS. There are countries where 1 Gbit internet speed is common, but in most places only 50-100 Mbit is available.

They still have to make consoles or console PCs that do the math and display the graphics locally.

Lmao you're pointing out whats obvious but not obvious to certain executives. They'll do anything to shift the blame of their failures instead of having focused executable strategies.

 

[Seanspeed]

For the Xbox One controller? That did include tooling as well. They rolled the initial statement back to 'over $100m'.

Hopefully we'll get to see more of their experiments one day. They didn't show them as part of the 20th? anniversary thing as far as I remember. They played around with all sorts, including a smell emitter.

If they resurrect smell based gameplay that 'most powerful generational leap' might have a whole context we didn't expect.

Tooling is part of costs. They 'rolled the initial statement back' because they realized how ridiculous it made them look. Microsoft do not know how to do 'lean' development and spending.

And what's even worse about this is that the actual XB1 controller we got was super boring. The idea that they even spent $100m+ on it only to pump out that functionally fine, but entirely unremarkable controller is depressing. They'd have done much better to just make a higher build quality X360 pad(which I still think is ergonomically superior) and saved most of that money.

 

[iroboto]

This is stupid, the cloud-based game will always remain a secondary line, you just can't build on it. And the main reason for this is lag, LAG. The most successful service-based and multiplayer games are unusable in online streaming services, even single-player games do not offer the same experience as with a dedicated hardware, namely because of the resolution. The global internet infrastructure is not yet ready to play properly in 4K image quality at a stable 60 FPS. There are countries where 1 Gbit internet speed is common, but in most places only 50-100 Mbit is available.

They still have to make consoles or console PCs that do the math and display the graphics locally.

Firstly, not stupid for a variety of reasons.
A) our network technologies do exist today for mobile game with near 0 latency. On the 5G network which is much easier to deploy globally and in rural areas, they have an area called multi access edge computing, which is really edge computing designed for mobile. Standard networks can’t get there, only the mobile networks can. It’s basically edge computing near where you are getting cellular service.

It’s design for realtime mobile applications, one of them is video game streaming, yet we have not had a company do that type of deployment yet, capital costs are considerable.

Combined with the fact that it’s becoming easier for service provider to provide home internet using 5G instead of fibre to the home.

Cloud streaming is an eventuality, the cross over point is going to be soon.

B) no mobile screen is 4K or needs to be.

C) the next generation of players have been playing Minecraft and Roblox. On their iPad for nearly free. The numbers here are massive. I can’t stress it enough, there are more Roblox players than all of console players combined.

So you have a situation where you have generations of kids growing up with devices that do a heck lot more than a gaming console, while playing these games for free, what makes you think they’ll agree with growing up and dropping $1000 on a console?

PC/Mac gaming is growing rapidly, because those are the tools they use for everything, streaming, content creation, school, chatting, social media, Netflix, and gaming. Consoles will never be able to replace that. You’re kidding yourself in thinking it will ever be able to.

So if you got the next generation of gamers, who are used to having slim slates to play on, there’s virtually 0 options available for them to have higher fidelity gaming outside of streaming.

Why pay tons of money for a console and a massive TV? When a simple iPad + mouse or controller will do? And they can play it anywhere they have a 5G connection.

Yes you may feel like MS is leaving you behind. And that’s precisely what everyone is doing. You’re aging out, if you’re 30-40, that population of gamers isn’t going to increase over time, but decrease and rapidly. I barely play games as it is today. I likely won’t be in 5 years time at all. Streaming will save me boatloads of money provided the service is good and GeForce Now is likely the one to get if high fidelity is what you want.

 

[QPlayer]

Firstly, not stupid for a variety of reasons.
A) our network technologies do exist today for mobile game with near 0 latency. On the 5G network which is much easier to deploy globally and in rural areas, they have an area called multi access edge computing, which is really edge computing designed for mobile. Standard networks can’t get there, only the mobile networks can. It’s basically edge computing near where you are getting cellular service.

It’s design for realtime mobile applications, one of them is video game streaming, yet we have not had a company do that type of deployment yet, capital costs are considerable.

Combined with the fact that it’s becoming easier for service provider to provide home internet using 5G instead of fibre to the home.

Cloud streaming is an eventuality, the cross over point is going to be soon.

B) no mobile screen is 4K or needs to be.

C) the next generation of players have been playing Minecraft and Roblox. On their iPad for nearly free. The numbers here are massive. I can’t stress it enough, there are more Roblox players than all of console players combined.

So you have a situation where you have generations of kids growing up with devices that do a heck lot more than a gaming console, while playing these games for free, what makes you think they’ll agree with growing up and dropping $1000 on a console?

PC/Mac gaming is growing rapidly, because those are the tools they use for everything, streaming, content creation, school, chatting, social media, Netflix, and gaming. Consoles will never be able to replace that. You’re kidding yourself in thinking it will ever be able to.

So if you got the next generation of gamers, who are used to having slim slates to play on, there’s virtually 0 options available for them to have higher fidelity gaming outside of streaming.

Why pay tons of money for a console and a massive TV? When a simple iPad + mouse or controller will do? And they can play it anywhere they have a 5G connection.

Yes you may feel like MS is leaving you behind. And that’s precisely what everyone is doing. You’re aging out, if you’re 30-40, that population of gamers isn’t going to increase over time, but decrease and rapidly. I barely play games as it is today. I likely won’t be in 5 years time at all. Streaming will save me boatloads of money provided the service is good and GeForce Now is likely the one to get if high fidelity is what you want.

It goes without saying that the mobile game market is already huge, you don't need to go into the future for that. However, we're talking big-screen spectacular AAA and AA games in this context. This also has its market, which, as you said, is also growing thanks to the PC.

If we were to deal with this topic so much
on the subject, if everyone only played roblox-like stuff, they would assume that all you need is a cheap cell phone and that's it... but no, we know very well that there is a group of players who pay billions for TV and for modern games that can be played on a monitor. And it's not age-related. Older and younger people play with consoles and PCs just like before, and this will not change in the future either. Well, they won't suddenly switch to mobile, that's for sure, not to mention the cinema-like experience provided by AAA games or the huge success of complex multiplayer games. They are still a user base of hundreds of millions.

As far as mobile Internet 0-latency networks are concerned, it is still a long way off, not to mention that it remains to be seen how it all works in practice. However, comparing the two gaming segments is pointless, again, those who want to play AAA games on a big screen will never look at a par-inch mobile to play with. These are two separate categories and markets.

 

[rntongo]

It goes without saying that the mobile game market is already huge, you don't need to go into the future for that. However, we're talking big-screen spectacular AAA and AA games in this context. This also has its market, which, as you said, is also growing thanks to the PC.

If we were to deal with this topic so much
on the subject, if everyone only played roblox-like stuff, they would assume that all you need is a cheap cell phone and that's it... but no, we know very well that there is a group of players who pay billions for TV and for modern games that can be played on a monitor. And it's not age-related. Older and younger people play with consoles and PCs just like before, and this will not change in the future either. Well, they won't suddenly switch to mobile, that's for sure, not to mention the cinema-like experience provided by AAA games or the huge success of complex multiplayer games. They are still a user base of hundreds of millions.

As far as mobile Internet 0-latency networks are concerned, it is still a long way off, not to mention that it remains to be seen how it all works in practice. However, comparing the two gaming segments is pointless, again, those who want to play AAA games on a big screen will never look at a par-inch mobile to play with. These are two separate categories and markets.

Spot on tbh.