Was there any doubt that they would need dedicated ML hardware to reach 8 bits 300 TOPs? It's "PS5 has no hardware RT narrative" all over again. And those narratives are never uttered on any others manufacturers (when they should actually). And I don't blame you BTW.Straight from an ex playstation game developer and now an AMD hardware dev.
Sources?With how Marc Cerny, usually overpromising/overseling tech and speed of adoption of it, has sold RT here the only thing this annoncement has done is lowering my expectation from rdna4
Could use sparse 2x shenanigans to reach that number. That number has probably been rounded up by the way.I think XDNA is a fairly reasonable piece of kit to support AI. It's not as silicon or power heavy as tensor cores found in deep learning GPUs. XDNA has been out for a few generations, and for semi-custom solutions, this seems like the right fit here.
I can't math out 300TOPs of int8 using 60 CUs, it's just too large a number.
Yes it's too high for me too. In Europe they have gone crazy and don't want people to buy this. This could be like PS4 Pro just an experiment to make developers get used to new techs (here PSSR and more RT), to prepare them for PS6.No.
Even if they hit the mark with the hardware, and had an amazing presentation. The only thing that could sink 5Pro would be the price, and I just feel that this price is just way too high for it to be successful.
Indeed. Don't get me started on Windows. When I use basic functions of windows I realize they are not improving simple stuff since years, decade. I am still fighting to accomplish things that should be simple. What an awful OS, only there because of a monopoly. Actually it reminds me of PS5 OS that got worse vs PS4. But why would they improve it?this thread has turned into about windows bug where sometimes it fails to hide the mouse cursor, and how LG OLED screens dies from its outer edges?
Last edited: