I got around 280ms, but well, I didn't try in the most comfortable position. Not so bad.BTW if you want to"test" yourself: Human reaction time benchmark.
I'd add that even if you are a few miliseconds behind what's actually happening on the screen when you play a game, the most important detail is that it is a constant, so your brain might be constantly behind of what's happening but the processing is transparent to you.Yeah, the brain is pretty high-latency, but
1-the predictive mechanisms (and pipelining) mean that we can sometimes still pick out timing offsets with precision that's pretty good considering the latency,
2-let's not try to pretend like network behavior doesn't regularly screw with stuff, especially in the glorious world of peer-to-peer asynchronous games.
BTW if you want to"test" yourself: Human reaction time benchmark.
Yeah, the brain is pretty high-latency, but
1-the predictive mechanisms (and pipelining) mean that we can sometimes still pick out timing offsets with precision that's pretty good considering the latency,
2-let's not try to pretend like network behavior doesn't regularly screw with stuff, especially in the glorious world of peer-to-peer asynchronous games.
BTW if you want to"test" yourself: Human reaction time benchmark.
This is actually a really important point. With a reaction time of 270 ms, as far as my brain is concerned I'm still pressing the button as soon as the colour changes. But if I had 270 ms from pressing a button to waiting to see the result on screen, I'd consider that an age.Yeah, the brain is pretty high-latency, but
1-the predictive mechanisms (and pipelining) mean that we can sometimes still pick out timing offsets with precision that's pretty good considering the latency.