Master-Mold said:
Yes.
I also believe Kameo, PDZ, CoD2, and Oblivion do as well.
CoD2 is a definitive no. Who has seen enough of PDZ to know anything? Oblivion would be a yes it appears (don't quote me on that). Kameo...
maven said:
We'll see at launch I guess, but personally I wouldn't miss 1080i - as it was going to be upscaled 720p anyway (at least for now) one might as well let the display do the upscaling.
1080i HDTVs can scale a 720p image. Yet 1080i is supported by the hardware and is in the spec, so who knows what is going on here.
Most launch games don't go gold for another 4-6 weeks, but it would be surely odd if the dashboard did not include 1080i support--especially since it is supporting every other oddball HDTV resolution.
Article said:
Improved upon Xbox, but no "killer features". Users of the Xbox 1 shouldn't throw it away, as there is no guarantee for compatible games and all their save-games would be lost. Home entertainment users can use the console as progressive DVD player, but not for HD or DivX (or need to buy Media Center PC).
Not news. And the last time I checked DVDs were really popular and a progressive scan one would be a nice upgrade, especially for a 2ndary home unit. No HD media out and DivX? If you have the media you have something to play it on. I personally don't know anyone with DivX material.
Article said:
The new games have more detailed gfx, but whether that is enough to convince Xbox fans to buy it is questionable. That is dependent on the available games, where fresh ideas are needed. For casual gamers 400 Euro is a lot of money, but the 300 + 35 Euro version is not justifiable for the 65 Euro price difference. This market segment will hardly buy Xbox Arcade games when the same can be head for free on the internet for the PC. Thus it will be difficult for Microsoft to position the Xbox 360 between the PS3 for High-End enthusiasts and the Nintendo Revolution for casual gamers to expand their market share.
I don't know their reader base but it really does appear to be slanted considering the darth of information and the non-release status of the platform--and those it is comparing it to. How can they honestly compare it to the PS3 and Rev without knowing the games or prices?
Obviously they missed the press notes about Nintendo aiming for a slightly different demo graphic and being a "2nd console". To consider the Xbox 360 a "casual" device crunched between the two and the PS3 "High-End" without seeing finished games or the final hardware strikes me as an editor who already has an opinion on the subject. Since author is writing from a lot of conjecture I am surprised he did not mention Kutaragi's comments on price. He obviously has a right to a conclusion, but basing one without really knowing what he is comparing it to--yet doing so anyhow--kind of smacks of poor journalism.
As for Xbox Arcade, without MS pushing it I doubt it will be a factor. But a little known fact is "mothers" are one of the largest gaming demographics. Computers are expensive. If you can get little johnny a gaming machine and play solitair at night on the same machine--for only $300--well, that is not something to outright dismiss. Hardcore gamers and journalists are really idiots when it comes to things like Myst, Sims, Deer Hunter, etc. The fact the massive "mother" game market goes unrepresented and unnoticed by very few is evidence of this.
I don't see MS really angling for that market, but they are leaving the door open. Women are a significantly untapped market and I would not undervalue the possibility of getting consumers on a $300 machine compared to much more expensive PCs. I don't think that is MS's primary goal--especially in a time when the console is a loss leader and this market wont be contributing back with heavy game sales--but down the road I think MS and Sony will be looking at the female market MUCH more seriously.