Ty said:PC-Engine said:one said:PC-Engine said:Yeah funny how they didn't go the streaming processor route like CELL and instead went with a SMP model.
I find it's more interesting that each element in the Cell processor, SPE and the Cell processor itself, has its own local memory near, and they form NUMA, rather than SMP.
Well interesting doesn't really pay the bills...
True, but neither does funny.
No but it's worth a million considering someone tried to make it sound like MS copied CELL because they thought the multi-core scaling concept was a new idea brought on by CELL even though CELL is a streaming processor which is not new at all (GPUs are streaming processors) while Xenon CPU is based on SMP which isn't new at all therefore the date of the MS patent has ZERO connection with CELL thinking.
one said:Yeah, seeing the filed date June 30, 2003, they seemed to have studied a lot about the other CPU architecture by thenMegadrive1988 said:nice. it would seem to me that Xe's CPU architecture is very modular and scalable, like ahem, another much talked about CPU architecture
Yep I'd say that's worth a million right there.