Tahir:
First, regarding the NV4x info... There's not a lot of it, but still, I find it quite impressive. It'll be released Sunday - and not by me either. Made a little agreement with someone from a site we all know about, so that more people know about it ( and that I get a few hits for NFI too
)
As for R420/Loki ( both are correct, but Loci is not, R400 is imprecise and R390 is outdated ) - What about saying somthing we don't know?
j/k
More seriously though, why do you think the *original* codename was R390? Because it's heavily based on the R3xx. We'll get VS3.0. / PS3.0. , but some features like Dynamic Branching will be very badly implemented, because ATI doesn't think it matters at this stage - no real-time application is gonna use that for a while.
Practically, I bet we're getting a R3xx with boosted instruction counts/registers and slow support for a lot of other things. But with overall GREATLY improved performance. Focus being on shaders 2.0. & AA speed while keeping the "possibility to claim features" .
The R420 is slated for Comdex 2003 - most likely a paper launch, though, maybe with a few ATI-done benchmarks. Doubt we'll get more, though.
Practically, the R420 *is* a refined R3xx. But considering they had nearly a full year for it, they obviously incorporated some other things
No where as feature-full as the R400 though, I'd guess ( I say guess because we know wayyy too little about the R400 )
Uttar